From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
x86@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/amd: don't set X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS if forced to zero
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:24:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170425182443.3ab75tkfosol2yk4@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170425180014.7533-1-jgross@suse.com>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:00:14PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> When running as Xen pv guest X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS must not be set
> on AMD cpus. Xen will disable this via setup_clear_cpu_cap(), so test
> cpu_caps_cleared to not have disabled this bit.
>
> This bug/feature bit is kind of special as it will be used very early
> when switching threads. Setting the bit and clearing it a little bit
> later leaves a critical window where things can go wrong. This time
> window has enlarged a little bit by using setup_clear_cpu_cap() instead
> of the hypervisor's set_cpu_features callback. It seems this larger
> window now makes it rather easy to hit the problem.
>
> The proper solution is to never set the bit in case of Xen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index c36140d788fe..f659b6f534b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -800,7 +800,9 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_3DNOWPREFETCH);
>
> /* AMD CPUs don't reset SS attributes on SYSRET */
> - set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS);
> + if (!test_bit(X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS,
> + (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared))
> + set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS);
> }
Hold on, AFAICT we have this order:
c_init() -> init_amd() sets X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS
init_hypervisor->x86_hyper->set_cpu_features-> clear_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS);
and all is good.
And I remember seeing a patchset doing some xen cpuid cleanup so I'm
assuming you're doing setup_clear_cpu_cap() now? And now we have to wag
the dog?
Confused.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-25 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-25 18:00 Juergen Gross
2017-04-25 18:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-04-25 18:34 ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-25 19:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 20:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2017-04-25 20:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 4:45 ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-26 6:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 18:24 ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-26 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-27 4:44 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170425182443.3ab75tkfosol2yk4@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®