From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
efault@gmx.de, pjt@google.com, clm@fb.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, yuyang.du@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched/fair: Align PELT windows between cfs_rq and its se
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 18:44:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170512171336.148578996@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512164416.108843033@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-sched-fair-align-windows.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3219 bytes --]
The PELT _sum values are a saw-tooth function, dropping on the decay
edge and then growing back up again during the window.
When these window-edges are not aligned between cfs_rq and se, we can
have the situation where, for example, on dequeue, the se decays
first.
Its _sum values will be small(er), while the cfs_rq _sum values will
still be on their way up. Because of this, the subtraction:
cfs_rq->avg._sum -= se->avg._sum will result in a positive value. This
will then, once the cfs_rq reaches an edge, translate into its _avg
value jumping up.
This is especially visible with the runnable_load bits, since they get
added/subtracted a lot.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -729,13 +729,8 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct
{
struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
- sa->last_update_time = 0;
- /*
- * sched_avg's period_contrib should be strictly less then 1024, so
- * we give it 1023 to make sure it is almost a period (1024us), and
- * will definitely be update (after enqueue).
- */
- sa->period_contrib = 1023;
+ memset(sa, 0, sizeof(*sa));
+
/*
* Tasks are intialized with full load to be seen as heavy tasks until
* they get a chance to stabilize to their real load level.
@@ -744,13 +739,9 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct
*/
if (entity_is_task(se))
sa->runnable_load_avg = sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
- sa->runnable_load_sum = sa->load_sum = LOAD_AVG_MAX;
- /*
- * At this point, util_avg won't be used in select_task_rq_fair anyway
- */
- sa->util_avg = 0;
- sa->util_sum = 0;
+ se->runnable_weight = se->load.weight;
+
/* when this task enqueue'ed, it will contribute to its cfs_rq's load_avg */
}
@@ -798,7 +789,6 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sc
} else {
sa->util_avg = cap;
}
- sa->util_sum = sa->util_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
}
if (entity_is_task(se)) {
@@ -3527,7 +3517,34 @@ update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct c
*/
static void attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
+ u32 divider = LOAD_AVG_MAX - 1024 + cfs_rq->avg.period_contrib;
+
+ /*
+ * When we attach the @se to the @cfs_rq, we must align the decay
+ * window because without that, really weird and wonderful things can
+ * happen.
+ *
+ * XXX illustrate
+ */
se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
+ se->avg.period_contrib = cfs_rq->avg.period_contrib;
+
+ /*
+ * Hell(o) Nasty stuff.. we need to recompute _sum based on the new
+ * period_contrib. This isn't strictly correct, but since we're
+ * entirely outside of the PELT hierarchy, nobody cares if we truncate
+ * _sum a little.
+ */
+ se->avg.util_sum = se->avg.util_avg * divider;
+
+ se->avg.load_sum = divider;
+ if (se_weight(se)) {
+ se->avg.load_sum =
+ div_u64(se->avg.load_avg * se->avg.load_sum, se_weight(se));
+ }
+
+ se->avg.runnable_load_sum = se->avg.load_sum;
+
__add_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
cfs_rq->avg.util_avg += se->avg.util_avg;
cfs_rq->avg.util_sum += se->avg.util_sum;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 16:44 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] sched/fair: A bit of a cgroup/PELT overhaul (again) Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched/fair: Clean up calc_cfs_shares() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-16 8:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched/fair: Add comment to calc_cfs_shares() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched/fair: Remove se->load.weight from se->avg.load_sum Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-17 7:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-17 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-17 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-29 20:11 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Use reweight_entity() for set_user_nice() tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched/fair: More accurate reweight_entity() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched/fair: Change update_load_avg() arguments Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-17 10:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched/fair: Move enqueue migrate handling Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 13:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched/fair: Rewrite cfs_rq->removed_*avg Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched/fair: Rewrite PELT migration propagation Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] sched/fair: Propagate an effective runnable_load_avg Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] sched/fair: more obvious Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched/fair: Synchonous PELT detach on load-balance migrate Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] sched/fair: Cure calc_cfs_shares() vs reweight_entity() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched/fair: More accurate async detach Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-16 22:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/14] sched/fair: A bit of a cgroup/PELT overhaul (again) Tejun Heo
2017-05-17 6:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170512171336.148578996@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®