From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched/fair: Remove se->load.weight from se->avg.load_sum
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 16:20:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517142010.pooe6iipiv43ubul@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517095045.GA8420@linaro.org>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:50:45AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Le Wednesday 17 May 2017 à 09:04:47 (+0200), Vincent Guittot a écrit :
> > I wonder if there is a problem with this new way to compute se's
> > load_avg and cfs_rq's load_avg when a task changes is nice prio before
> > migrating to another CPU.
> >
> > se load_avg is now: runnable x current weight
> > but cfs_rq load_avg keeps the history of the previous weight of the se
> > When we detach se, we will remove an up to date se's load_avg from
> > cfs_rq which doesn't have the up to date load_avg in its own load_avg.
> > So if se's prio decreases just before migrating, some load_avg stays
> > in prev cfs_rq and if se's prio increases, we will remove too much
> > load_avg and possibly make the cfs_rq load_avg null whereas other
> > tasks are running.
> >
> > Thought ?
> >
> > I'm able to reproduce the problem with a simple rt-app use case (after
> > adding a new feature in rt-app)
> >
> > Vincent
> >
>
> The hack below fixes the problem I mentioned above. It applies on task what is
> done when updating group_entity's weight
Right. I didn't think people much used nice so I skipped it for now. Yes
your patch looks about right for that.
I'll include it, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-17 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 16:44 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] sched/fair: A bit of a cgroup/PELT overhaul (again) Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched/fair: Clean up calc_cfs_shares() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-16 8:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched/fair: Add comment to calc_cfs_shares() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched/fair: Remove se->load.weight from se->avg.load_sum Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-17 7:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-17 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-17 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-09-29 20:11 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Use reweight_entity() for set_user_nice() tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched/fair: More accurate reweight_entity() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched/fair: Change update_load_avg() arguments Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-17 10:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched/fair: Move enqueue migrate handling Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 13:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched/fair: Rewrite cfs_rq->removed_*avg Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched/fair: Rewrite PELT migration propagation Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] sched/fair: Propagate an effective runnable_load_avg Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] sched/fair: more obvious Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched/fair: Synchonous PELT detach on load-balance migrate Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] sched/fair: Cure calc_cfs_shares() vs reweight_entity() Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched/fair: Align PELT windows between cfs_rq and its se Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-12 16:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched/fair: More accurate async detach Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-16 22:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/14] sched/fair: A bit of a cgroup/PELT overhaul (again) Tejun Heo
2017-05-17 6:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170517142010.pooe6iipiv43ubul@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®