* [PATCH] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on @ 2017-05-26 23:59 Jaegeuk Kim 2017-05-31 13:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2017-05-26 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim If we got failure from both of create and evict_inode, we can hit this wrong bug_on. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c index e53c784ab11e..5673b0bd83b5 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c @@ -426,8 +426,6 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino); clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID); } - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err && - !exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)); out_clear: fscrypt_put_encryption_info(inode, NULL); clear_inode(inode); -- 2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on 2017-05-26 23:59 [PATCH] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on Jaegeuk Kim @ 2017-05-31 13:24 ` Chao Yu 2017-06-01 2:12 ` Jaegeuk Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Yu @ 2017-05-31 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaegeuk Kim, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel Hi Jaegeuk, On 2017/5/27 7:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > If we got failure from both of create and evict_inode, we can hit this wrong > bug_on. > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > --- > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > index e53c784ab11e..5673b0bd83b5 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > @@ -426,8 +426,6 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino); > clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID); > } > - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err && > - !exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)); We expect that we can keep the inode in orphan list in handle_failed_inode path when inode page have been persisted, so that if there is anything error in evice_inode, we can have another chance to release inode resource during next mount. Here we need to check this case, additionally, if we failed to add the inode into orphan list in handle_failed_inode, we must have set SBI_NEED_FSCK in cp pack, so we need check the case too. So we can change the code to: f2fs_bug_on(err && err != -ENOENT && (!exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO) || !is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK)); How do you think? Thanks, > out_clear: > fscrypt_put_encryption_info(inode, NULL); > clear_inode(inode); > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on 2017-05-31 13:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu @ 2017-06-01 2:12 ` Jaegeuk Kim 2017-06-01 2:56 ` Chao Yu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2017-06-01 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel On 05/31, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > On 2017/5/27 7:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > If we got failure from both of create and evict_inode, we can hit this wrong > > bug_on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > > index e53c784ab11e..5673b0bd83b5 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > > @@ -426,8 +426,6 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) > > alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino); > > clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID); > > } > > - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err && > > - !exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)); > > We expect that we can keep the inode in orphan list in > handle_failed_inode path when inode page have been persisted, so that if > there is anything error in evice_inode, we can have another chance to > release inode resource during next mount. > > Here we need to check this case, additionally, if we failed to add the > inode into orphan list in handle_failed_inode, we must have set > SBI_NEED_FSCK in cp pack, so we need check the case too. > > So we can change the code to: > > f2fs_bug_on(err && err != -ENOENT && > (!exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO) || > !is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK)); Yup, I'll try this. ;) Thanks, > > How do you think? > > Thanks, > > > out_clear: > > fscrypt_put_encryption_info(inode, NULL); > > clear_inode(inode); > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on 2017-06-01 2:12 ` Jaegeuk Kim @ 2017-06-01 2:56 ` Chao Yu 2017-06-01 22:47 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Yu @ 2017-06-01 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel On 2017/6/1 10:12, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 05/31, Chao Yu wrote: >> Hi Jaegeuk, >> >> On 2017/5/27 7:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> If we got failure from both of create and evict_inode, we can hit this wrong >>> bug_on. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> >>> --- >>> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 -- >>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c >>> index e53c784ab11e..5673b0bd83b5 100644 >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c >>> @@ -426,8 +426,6 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) >>> alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino); >>> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID); >>> } >>> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err && >>> - !exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)); >> >> We expect that we can keep the inode in orphan list in >> handle_failed_inode path when inode page have been persisted, so that if >> there is anything error in evice_inode, we can have another chance to >> release inode resource during next mount. >> >> Here we need to check this case, additionally, if we failed to add the >> inode into orphan list in handle_failed_inode, we must have set >> SBI_NEED_FSCK in cp pack, so we need check the case too. >> >> So we can change the code to: >> >> f2fs_bug_on(err && err != -ENOENT && >> (!exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO) || >> !is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK)); Oh, looks like it needs to use '&&' in between exist_written_data and is_sbi_flag_set. Could you fix this? Thanks, > > Yup, I'll try this. ;) > > Thanks, > >> >> How do you think? >> >> Thanks, >> >>> out_clear: >>> fscrypt_put_encryption_info(inode, NULL); >>> clear_inode(inode); >>> > > . > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on 2017-06-01 2:56 ` Chao Yu @ 2017-06-01 22:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2017-06-01 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Yu; +Cc: Chao Yu, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-f2fs-devel For example, f2fs_create - new_node_page is failed - handle_failed_inode - skip to add it into orphan list, since ni.blk_addr == NULL_ADDR : set_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID) f2fs_evict_inode - EIO due to fault injection - f2fs_bug_on() is triggered So, we don't need to call f2fs_bug_on in this case. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> --- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c index e53c784ab11e..868d71436ebc 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c @@ -425,9 +425,10 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_FREE_NID)) { alloc_nid_failed(sbi, inode->i_ino); clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_FREE_NID); + } else { + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err && + !exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)); } - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err && - !exist_written_data(sbi, inode->i_ino, ORPHAN_INO)); out_clear: fscrypt_put_encryption_info(inode, NULL); clear_inode(inode); -- 2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-01 22:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-05-26 23:59 [PATCH] f2fs: remove false-positive bug_on Jaegeuk Kim 2017-05-31 13:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2017-06-01 2:12 ` Jaegeuk Kim 2017-06-01 2:56 ` Chao Yu 2017-06-01 22:47 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome