From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
g@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] drm/arm: malidp: Use crtc->mode_valid() callback
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:48:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531104820.GE7992@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170531082004.pmqhieuvynnpjwcy@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:37:29AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 09:29:44AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > On 05/25/2017 04:19 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > > > Now that we have a callback to check if crtc supports a given mode
> > > > we can use it in malidp so that we restrict the number of probbed
> > > > modes to the ones we can actually display.
> > > >
> > > > Also, remove the mode_fixup() callback as this is no longer needed
> > > > because mode_valid() will be called before.
> > > >
> > > > NOTE: Not even compiled tested
> >
> > I did compile it, even done some testing, but by no means have I managed
> > to cover all the cases. Looks OK to me.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
> > > > Cc: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
>
> What does this mean? Do you expect me to merge this through drm-misc? Or
> do you plan to merge it through your arm tree (all the required patches
> are in drm-misc-next and will be in Dave's tree soonish)?
>
> /me confused.
/me too. :) I've only got Cc-ed on one patch, so I'm guessing the whole series is
going to be picked up through drm-misc. For patches that are part of a larger
series (to me) it makes sense to push them through a single channel. But I'm not
the author of the series so I don't know what Jose prefers. If Jose wants this
patch to go through mali-dp tree then I'm happy to pull it, otherwise I can sort out
the conflict(s) before sending a pull request to Dave.
On the larger topic, I'm guessing this is not the first time a series touches multiple
drivers that are not together in a single tree. How was this sorted in the past? Is
there a better way?
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Thanks, Daniel
>
> >
> > > > Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_crtc.c | 11 +++++------
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_crtc.c
> > > > index 9446a67..4bb38a2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_crtc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_crtc.c
> > > > @@ -22,9 +22,8 @@
> > > > #include "malidp_drv.h"
> > > > #include "malidp_hw.h"
> > > >
> > > > -static bool malidp_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > > - const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> > > > - struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> > > > +static enum drm_mode_status malidp_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > > > {
> > > > struct malidp_drm *malidp = crtc_to_malidp_device(crtc);
> > > > struct malidp_hw_device *hwdev = malidp->dev;
> > > > @@ -40,11 +39,11 @@ static bool malidp_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > > if (rate != req_rate) {
> > > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("pxlclk doesn't support %ld Hz\n",
> > > > req_rate);
> > > > - return false;
> > > > + return MODE_NOCLOCK;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - return true;
> > > > + return MODE_OK;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void malidp_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > > > @@ -408,7 +407,7 @@ static int malidp_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs malidp_crtc_helper_funcs = {
> > > > - .mode_fixup = malidp_crtc_mode_fixup,
> > > > + .mode_valid = malidp_crtc_mode_valid,
> > > > .enable = malidp_crtc_enable,
> > > > .disable = malidp_crtc_disable,
> > > > .atomic_check = malidp_crtc_atomic_check,
> > > >
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >
> > --
> > ====================
> > | I would like to |
> > | fix the world, |
> > | but they're not |
> > | giving me the |
> > \ source code! /
> > ---------------
> > ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 14:19 [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce new mode validation callbacks Jose Abreu
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] drm: Add drm_{crtc/encoder/connector}_mode_valid() Jose Abreu
2017-05-30 6:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-30 7:26 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] drm: Introduce drm_bridge_mode_valid() Jose Abreu
2017-05-26 4:25 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-30 7:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper Jose Abreu
2017-05-30 7:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm: Use mode_valid() in atomic modeset Jose Abreu
2017-05-29 19:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-30 7:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] drm: arcpgu: Use crtc->mode_valid() callback Jose Abreu
2017-05-30 7:28 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-06-21 9:38 ` Jose Abreu
2017-06-22 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] drm/bridge: analogix-anx78xx: Use bridge->mode_valid() callback Jose Abreu
2017-05-26 4:27 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-30 7:28 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-30 10:35 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] drm/bridge/synopsys: dw-hdmi: " Jose Abreu
2017-05-29 9:45 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-30 10:24 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-30 10:29 ` Philipp Zabel
2017-06-05 7:53 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] drm/arm: malidp: Use crtc->mode_valid() callback Jose Abreu
2017-05-30 7:29 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-05-30 9:37 ` Liviu Dudau
2017-05-31 8:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-31 10:48 ` Liviu Dudau [this message]
2017-05-31 10:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-31 11:09 ` Liviu Dudau
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] drm/atmel-hlcdc: " Jose Abreu
2017-05-30 7:30 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-06-02 9:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-25 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] drm: vc4: Use crtc->mode_valid() and encoder->mode_valid() callbacks Jose Abreu
2017-05-30 7:30 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-06-02 20:10 ` Eric Anholt
2017-06-20 8:47 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531104820.GE7992@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=g@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®