From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: remove unused variable in boot_cpu_state_init
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:02:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622090241.3cwwfesg7c43lgbq@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3_yRSYq0nezytp632Yz6gHgOqTm+csCXpLvO2XqyXWDg@mail.gmail.com>
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > So, to continue this side thought about uninitialized_var(), it is dangerous
> > because the following buggy pattern does not generate a compiler warning:
> >
> > long uninitialized_var(error);
> >
> > ...
> >
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> >
> > ... and still there are over 290 uses of uninitialized_var() in the kernel - and
> > any of them could turn into a silent but real uninitialized variable bugs due to
> > subsequent changes.
>
> Right, absolutely agreed on that. A related problem however is blindly
> initializing variables to NULL to get rid of uninitialized variable warnings,
> such as
>
> struct subsystem_specific *obj = NULL;
> if (function_argument > 10)
> goto err;
> obj = create_obj();
> ...
> err:
> clean_up(obj->member);
>
>
> I've seen a couple of variations of that problem, so simply outlawing
> uninitialized_var() will only solve a subset of these issues, and ideally
> we should also make sure that initializations at declaration time are
> used properly, and not just to shut up compiler warnings.
Well, a deterministic crash on a NULL dereference is still (much) better than a
non-deterministic 'use random value from stack and corrupt memory or crash' bug
pattern, right?
Also, static analysis tools ought to be pretty good about finding control flows
where a NULL gets dereferenced.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 21:57 Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-21 22:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-21 22:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 14:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-22 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-22 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 7:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-22 8:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 9:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-06-22 9:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-22 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170622090241.3cwwfesg7c43lgbq@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®