From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Piotr Luc" <piotr.luc@intel.com>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"Reza Arbab" <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) descrption
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:45:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725054522.GA21822@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170724190757.11278-2-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:07:41PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
Subject: Re: [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) descrption
^^^^^^^^^^
Please introduce a spellchecker into your workflow.
> Update amd-memory-encryption document describing the AMD Secure Encrypted
"Update the AMD memory encryption document...
The patch has the proper URL already.
> Virtualization (SEV) feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
> Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt
> index f512ab7..747df07 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -Secure Memory Encryption (SME) is a feature found on AMD processors.
> +Secure Memory Encryption (SME) and Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) are
> +features found on AMD processors.
>
> SME provides the ability to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted using
> the standard x86 page tables. A page that is marked encrypted will be
> @@ -6,6 +7,12 @@ automatically decrypted when read from DRAM and encrypted when written to
> DRAM. SME can therefore be used to protect the contents of DRAM from physical
> attacks on the system.
>
> +SEV enables running encrypted virtual machine (VMs) in which the code and data
machines
> +of the virtual machine are secured so that decrypted version is available only
... of the guest VM ... ... so that a decrypted ...
> +within the VM itself. SEV guest VMs have concept of private and shared memory.
have *the* concept - you need to use
definite and indefinite articles in your
text.
> +Private memory is encrypted with the guest-specific key, while shared memory
> +may be encrypted with hypervisor key.
And here you explain that the hypervisor key is the same key which we
use in SME. So that people can make the connection.
> +
> A page is encrypted when a page table entry has the encryption bit set (see
> below on how to determine its position). The encryption bit can also be
> specified in the cr3 register, allowing the PGD table to be encrypted. Each
> @@ -19,11 +26,20 @@ so that the PGD is encrypted, but not set the encryption bit in the PGD entry
> for a PUD which results in the PUD pointed to by that entry to not be
> encrypted.
>
> -Support for SME can be determined through the CPUID instruction. The CPUID
> -function 0x8000001f reports information related to SME:
> +When SEV is enabled, certain type of memory (namely insruction pages and guest
When SEV is enabled, instruction pages and guest page tables are ...
> +page tables) are always treated as private. Due to security reasons all DMA
security reasons??
> +operations inside the guest must be performed on shared memory. Since the
> +memory encryption bit is only controllable by the guest OS when it is operating
... is controlled ...
> +in 64-bit or 32-bit PAE mode, in all other modes the SEV hardware forces memory
... forces the memory ...
> +encryption bit to 1.
> +
> +Support for SME and SEV can be determined through the CPUID instruction. The
> +CPUID function 0x8000001f reports information related to SME:
>
> 0x8000001f[eax]:
> Bit[0] indicates support for SME
> + 0x800001f[eax]:
There's a 0 missing and you don't really need it as it is already above.
> + Bit[1] indicates support for SEV
> 0x8000001f[ebx]:
> Bits[5:0] pagetable bit number used to activate memory
> encryption
> @@ -39,6 +55,13 @@ determine if SME is enabled and/or to enable memory encryption:
> Bit[23] 0 = memory encryption features are disabled
> 1 = memory encryption features are enabled
>
> +If SEV is supported, MSR 0xc0010131 (MSR_F17H_SEV) can be used to determine if
If this MSR is going to be part of the architecture - and I really think
it is - then call it MSR_AMD64_SEV.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 19:07 [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) descrption Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 5:45 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-07-25 14:59 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 02/17] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 10:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 14:58 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-25 15:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-25 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-09 18:17 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 8:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 03/17] x86/mm: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 4:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-26 16:47 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 13:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 04/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 14:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 05/17] x86, realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 16:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-10 13:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 06/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 07/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 14:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-28 8:47 ` David Laight
2017-08-17 18:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 18:10 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 08/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-28 10:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 09/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Brijesh Singh
2017-07-28 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 18:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-17 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 10/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-07-31 8:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31 22:19 ` Kees Cook
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
2017-08-02 4:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:22 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 12/17] x86/mm: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-08-07 3:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-17 19:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-07-25 9:51 ` David Laight
2017-07-26 10:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-26 19:24 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-26 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-07-26 20:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-27 7:45 ` David Laight
2017-08-22 16:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:13 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 14:48 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-15 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-15 16:27 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 14/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-08-23 15:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-24 18:54 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-25 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 15/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-08-28 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-28 11:49 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 16/17] X86/KVM: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-08-29 10:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-30 16:18 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-30 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-01 22:52 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-02 3:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-03 2:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-04 17:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-04 17:47 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-07-24 19:07 ` [RFC Part1 PATCH v3 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-08-31 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725054522.GA21822@nazgul.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®