mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Francis Deslauriers <francis.deslauriers@efficios.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Do not jump-optimize kprobes on irq entry code
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:45:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725104554.b58850228986eb94d56dcb0e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725091529.f278542cb1216ae453709371@kernel.org>

On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:15:29 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> > arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c is only compiled when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > is enabled, but CONFIG_KPROBES does not depend on it.
> > 
> > Is unwind_frame.c really where in_entry_code() should be implemented, now
> > that its symbol becomes exposed to other compile units ?
> 
> At least kprobes needs it. (as far 
> It seems we can move it in arch/x86/entry/common.c or 
> somewhere in header. (arm has arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h for
> that purpose)

As far as I can see, that code is only for unwinder or kprobes,
and only arm/arm64 has similar code.

I've decided to make this fix kprobe/opt.c local, since this fix
is also needed for stable. I'll send v2 patch soon.

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-25  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-24 13:50 Masami Hiramatsu
2017-07-24 14:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-07-25  0:15   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-07-25  1:45     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2017-07-25  4:29 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170725104554.b58850228986eb94d56dcb0e@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=francis.deslauriers@efficios.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®