From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3]: documentation,atomic: Add new documents
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 20:47:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170726124750.vktrn5zi2gmpzfru@tardis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170726115328.2sxiitivlnlq64dk@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2116 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:53:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> New version..
>
>
> ---
> Subject: documentation,atomic: Add new documents
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 12 14:50:27 CEST 2017
>
> Since we've vastly expanded the atomic_t interface in recent years the
> existing documentation is woefully out of date and people seem to get
> confused a bit.
>
> Start a new document to hopefully better explain the current state of
> affairs.
>
> The old atomic_ops.txt also covers bitmaps and a few more details so
> this is not a full replacement and we'll therefore keep that document
> around until such a time that we've managed to write more text to cover
> its entire.
>
You seems have a unfinished paragraph..
> Also please, ReST people, go away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
[...]
> +
> +Further, while something like:
> +
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> + atomic_dec(&X);
> +
> +is a 'typical' RELEASE pattern, the barrier is strictly stronger than
> +a RELEASE. Similarly for something like:
> +
.. at here. Maybe you planned to put stronger ACQUIRE pattern?
> +
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ VARIETIES OF MEMORY BARRIER
> This means that ACQUIRE acts as a minimal "acquire" operation and
> RELEASE acts as a minimal "release" operation.
>
[...]
> -
> -[!] Note that special memory barrier primitives are available for these
> -situations because on some CPUs the atomic instructions used imply full memory
> -barriers, and so barrier instructions are superfluous in conjunction with them,
> -and in such cases the special barrier primitives will be no-ops.
> -
> -See Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst for more information.
> +See Documentation/atomic_t.txt for more information.
>
s/atomic_t.txt/atomic_{t,bitops}.txt/ ?
other than those two tiny things,
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Regards,
Boqun
>
> ACCESSING DEVICES
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-26 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 9:24 [RFC][PATCH]: documentation,atomic: Add a new atomic_t document Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH] atomic: Fix atomic_set_release() for 'funny' architectures Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 17:28 ` Vineet Gupta
2017-06-09 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 18:58 ` James Bottomley
2017-06-09 14:03 ` Chris Metcalf
2017-08-10 12:10 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomic: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-09 15:44 ` [RFC][PATCH]: documentation,atomic: Add a new atomic_t document Will Deacon
2017-06-09 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-11 13:56 ` Boqun Feng
2017-06-12 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-13 6:39 ` Boqun Feng
2017-06-14 12:33 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-12 12:53 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-12 19:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 11:53 ` [RFC][PATCH v3]: documentation,atomic: Add new documents Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-26 12:47 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2017-07-31 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-31 11:04 ` Boqun Feng
2017-07-31 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 2:14 ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-01 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 10:19 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 12:17 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 16:53 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 22:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-02 8:46 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-01 18:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-02 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-02 16:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-03 14:05 ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-03 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-03 16:12 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-03 16:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 13:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-26 16:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2017-06-09 18:15 ` [RFC][PATCH]: documentation,atomic: Add a new atomic_t document Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170726124750.vktrn5zi2gmpzfru@tardis \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®