mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] acpi, x86: Remove encryption mask from ACPI page protection type
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:41:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727144159.GD28548@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45cc8e44980cbc1372c63420ebafc8c8466e958f.1501092102.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:04:34PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The function arch_apei_get_mem_attributes() is used to set the page
> protection type for ACPI physical addresses. When SME is active, the
> associated protection type needs to not have the encryption mask set
> since the ACPI tables live in un-encrypted memory. Modify the
> arch_apei_get_mem_attributes() function to remove the encryption mask
> when SME is active by returning the PAGE_KERNEL_IO protection type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 562286f..89df39d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>  # include <asm/pgtable_types.h>
> +# include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> @@ -164,8 +165,12 @@ static inline pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr)
>  	 * anything other than PAGE_KERNEL (some arm64 platforms
>  	 * require the equivalent of PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE), return that
>  	 * until we know differently.
> +	 *
> +	 * When SME is active, the ACPI information will not reside in
> +	 * in memory in an encrypted state so return a protection attribute
> +	 * that does not have the encryption bit set.
>  	 */
> -	 return PAGE_KERNEL;
> +	 return sme_active() ? PAGE_KERNEL_IO : PAGE_KERNEL;

Why isn't there a PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC define which you can simply return
instead of testing?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-27 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-26 18:04 [PATCH v1 0/2] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) fixes 2017-07-26 Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/mm, kexec: Fix memory corruption with SME on successive kexecs Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27  7:17   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-27 14:15     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 17:34       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-27 18:47         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] acpi, x86: Remove encryption mask from ACPI page protection type Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27  7:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-27 14:53     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 14:41   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-07-27 14:57     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-28  6:28       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170727144159.GD28548@nazgul.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®