From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] acpi, x86: Remove encryption mask from ACPI page protection type
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:28:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728062807.k7bzg3qgxsxlllly@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d7f9a32-89d1-e2f2-4dea-98527ac3492e@amd.com>
* Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
> > > + * in memory in an encrypted state so return a protection attribute
> > > + * that does not have the encryption bit set.
> > > */
> > > - return PAGE_KERNEL;
> > > + return sme_active() ? PAGE_KERNEL_IO : PAGE_KERNEL;
> >
> > Why isn't there a PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC define which you can simply return
> > instead of testing?
>
> Sounds like something I should add to pgtable_types.h (which has a
> #define for PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC_NOENC, but not PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC). I'll
> create that #define.
>
> As for the sme_active() check I was getting ahead of myself since
> under SEV the encryption mask is needed. I'll change it to just
> return PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC and then worry about the SEV change in
> the SEV patches.
Ok, that works for me too, as we at least don't sprinke the code with repeated
sme_active() toggles.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 18:04 [PATCH v1 0/2] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) fixes 2017-07-26 Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/mm, kexec: Fix memory corruption with SME on successive kexecs Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-27 14:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-27 18:47 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] acpi, x86: Remove encryption mask from ACPI page protection type Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-27 14:53 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 14:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-28 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728062807.k7bzg3qgxsxlllly@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®