mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] acpi, x86: Remove encryption mask from ACPI page protection type
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:28:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728062807.k7bzg3qgxsxlllly@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d7f9a32-89d1-e2f2-4dea-98527ac3492e@amd.com>


* Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:

> > > +	 * in memory in an encrypted state so return a protection attribute
> > > +	 * that does not have the encryption bit set.
> > >   	 */
> > > -	 return PAGE_KERNEL;
> > > +	 return sme_active() ? PAGE_KERNEL_IO : PAGE_KERNEL;
> > 
> > Why isn't there a PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC define which you can simply return
> > instead of testing?
> 
> Sounds like something I should add to pgtable_types.h (which has a
> #define for PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC_NOENC, but not PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC). I'll
> create that #define.
> 
> As for the sme_active() check I was getting ahead of myself since
> under SEV the encryption mask is needed.  I'll change it to just
> return PAGE_KERNEL_NOENC and then worry about the SEV change in
> the SEV patches.

Ok, that works for me too, as we at least don't sprinke the code with repeated 
sme_active() toggles.

Thanks,

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-26 18:04 [PATCH v1 0/2] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) fixes 2017-07-26 Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] x86/mm, kexec: Fix memory corruption with SME on successive kexecs Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27  7:17   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-27 14:15     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 17:34       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-27 18:47         ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-26 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] acpi, x86: Remove encryption mask from ACPI page protection type Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27  7:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-07-27 14:53     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-27 14:41   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-27 14:57     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-07-28  6:28       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170728062807.k7bzg3qgxsxlllly@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®