From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] trace-cmd: use asprintf when possible
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:33:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170731153340.4999978a@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1967443.iUBOHzf2Bp@harkonnen>
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:21:11 +0200
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> I found some free time and unfortunately I can't enjoy the sun, so here I am
> on this patch.
> Before submitting the V2, one comment (inline)
Ah you caught me in a middle of a very busy traveling week.
> > But still, it is not immediately obvious why we need this without reading
> > how the function has been used.
> >
> > Answer to the question:
> > we need it because when we call `create_event()` we pass the path to the
> > filter file, and not the path to the event directory.
> >
> >
> > In my opinion we should pass the path to the event directory, and from this
> > we can build the event_list's paths. To me, it sounds more correct for a
> > function named `create_event()`, rather than:
> > - taking a path to a specific event file,
> > - deduce the event directory,
> > - build the path for the other event files,
>
> While I was fixing my patch according to what we said last time, I think I
> recall what was my true original meaning of "/* FIXME is it ok ? */". (What I
> wrote last time is still valid anyway)
>
> The questions comes by the fact that this line:
>
> *p = '\0'; /* FIXME is it ok ? */
>
> changes the input parameter by cutting it (it does what dirname() does).
> So, "is it ok (to cut the input string)?". According to the internal usage,
> when a function uses `create_event()`, it passes a generated string that then
> is not used anymore. So, nobody cares if this string has been manipulated by
> create_event().
>
> I think that this should not happen. So I will propose a patch V2 where I use
> `dirname()` as suggested but on local duplicate using `strdup()`. This
> guarantee (even if it is not necessary) that the input string does not change.
>
That's a waste. The path parameter is not "const" which means that it
*can* be modified. When an input string should not be modified, then it
is documented by making it a const char* type.
Don't bother making a local out of it. If you still feel uneasy about
it, simply add a comment to the start of the function that the path
variable is modified.
> > > > diff --git a/trace-stat.c b/trace-stat.c
> > > > index adbf3c3..778c199 100644
> > > > --- a/trace-stat.c
> > > > +++ b/trace-stat.c
> > > > @@ -70,15 +70,16 @@ char *strstrip(char *str)
> > > >
> > > > return s;
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +/* FIXME repeated */
> > >
> > > What do you mean by that?
>
> I forget to answer to this point last time.
>
> The function `append_file()` is implemented twice in trace-stat.c and trace-
> util.c
>
> I noticed that those two files are included in different binaries (trace-cmd
> and the libraries). I just put a note because instead of having multiple
> implementation we can have just one in a file that gets included where is
> needed. Of course, if it is just for such a simple function it does not make
> much sense right now. But if we can group all the internal helpers I believe
> is better.
>
> I will remove the fixme from the V2 patch
Or you can keep the comment, but make it better. That is:
/* FIXME: append_file() is duplicated and could be consolidated */
That way, it's self explanatory, and not confuse people even more ;-)
-- Steve
>
> > >
> > > > char *append_file(const char *dir, const char *name)
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > char *file;
> > > >
> > > > + int ret;
> > > >
> > > > - file = malloc(strlen(dir) + strlen(name) + 2);
> > > > - if (!file)
> > > > + ret = asprintf(&file, "%s/%s", dir, name);
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > >
> > > > die("Failed to allocate %s/%s", dir, name);
> > > >
> > > > - sprintf(file, "%s/%s", dir, name);
> > > >
> > > > return file;
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-05 9:31 Minor Code Clean Up Federico Vaga
2017-06-05 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] trace-cmd: use asprintf when possible Federico Vaga
2017-07-06 22:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-10 0:08 ` Federico Vaga
2017-07-25 14:21 ` Federico Vaga
2017-07-31 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-07-31 23:12 ` Federico Vaga
2017-06-05 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] trace-cmd: replace show_file() -> show_instance_file() Federico Vaga
2017-07-06 22:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-10 0:15 ` Federico Vaga
2017-07-31 19:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-07-31 23:27 ` Federico Vaga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170731153340.4999978a@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®