From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [Part1 PATCH v4 08/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 07:34:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170916123418.37807-9-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170916123418.37807-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
The walk_iomem_res_desc(), walk_system_ram_res() and walk_system_ram_range()
functions each have much of the same code. Create a new function that
consolidates the common code from these functions in one place to reduce
the amount of duplicated code.
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
---
kernel/resource.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 9b5f04404152..7323c1b636cd 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -400,6 +400,26 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
return 0;
}
+static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
+ bool first_level_children_only,
+ void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
+{
+ u64 orig_end = res->end;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ while ((res->start < res->end) &&
+ !find_next_iomem_res(res, desc, first_level_children_only)) {
+ ret = (*func)(res->start, res->end, arg);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ res->start = res->end + 1;
+ res->end = orig_end;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Walks through iomem resources and calls func() with matching resource
* ranges. This walks through whole tree and not just first level children.
@@ -418,26 +438,12 @@ int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
{
struct resource res;
- u64 orig_end;
- int ret = -1;
res.start = start;
res.end = end;
res.flags = flags;
- orig_end = res.end;
-
- while ((res.start < res.end) &&
- (!find_next_iomem_res(&res, desc, false))) {
-
- ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
- if (ret)
- break;
-
- res.start = res.end + 1;
- res.end = orig_end;
- }
- return ret;
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, desc, false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -451,22 +457,13 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
{
struct resource res;
- u64 orig_end;
- int ret = -1;
res.start = start;
res.end = end;
res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- orig_end = res.end;
- while ((res.start < res.end) &&
- (!find_next_iomem_res(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true))) {
- ret = (*func)(res.start, res.end, arg);
- if (ret)
- break;
- res.start = res.end + 1;
- res.end = orig_end;
- }
- return ret;
+
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(&res, IORES_DESC_NONE, true,
+ arg, func);
}
#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY)
@@ -508,6 +505,7 @@ static int __is_ram(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg)
{
return 1;
}
+
/*
* This generic page_is_ram() returns true if specified address is
* registered as System RAM in iomem_resource list.
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-16 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-16 12:34 [Part1 PATCH v4 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) description Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 15:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 02/17] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-26 19:06 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 03/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 04/17] x86/realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 05/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 06/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 07/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2017-09-17 14:05 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 08/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 09/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 10/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-26 19:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 11/17] x86/mm: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 12/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-26 19:10 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 15:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-26 19:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 14/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-09-17 15:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 15/17] percpu: introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_UNENCRYPTED Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 3:13 ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-19 10:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 13:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-20 7:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-20 16:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 16/17] X86/KVM: Unencrypt shared per-cpu variables when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-19 14:00 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-20 7:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-16 12:34 ` [Part1 PATCH v4 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-19 11:47 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170916123418.37807-9-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®