From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 00/14] lockdep: Support deadlock detection for recursive read locks
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 06:18:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170925221848.6646-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Ingo and Peter,
This is V3 for recursive read lock support in lockdep.
Changes since V2:
* Add one revert patch for commit d82fed752942
("locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests"),
since we could handle recursive read lock correctly, so we don't
need to fudge the test anymore.
* More document and print-message changes for redefining
LOCK*_STATE*.
* Rewrite some commit logs to improve the explanation of the idea.
V1: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150393341825453
V2: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150468649417950
As Peter pointed out:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150349072023540
The lockdep current has a limit support for recursive read locks, the
deadlock case as follow could not be detected:
read_lock(A);
lock(B);
lock(B);
write_lock(A);
I got some inspiration from Gautham R Shenoy:
https://lwn.net/Articles/332801/
, and came up with this series.
The basic idea is:
* Add recursive read locks into the graph
* Classify dependencies into --(RR)-->, --(NR)-->, --(RN)-->,
--(NN)-->, where R stands for recursive read lock, N stands for
other locks(i.e. non-recursive read locks and write locks).
* Define strong dependency paths as the paths of dependencies
don't have two adjacent dependencies as --(*R)--> and --(R*)-->.
* Extend __bfs() to only traverse on strong dependency paths.
* If __bfs() finds a strong dependency circle, then a deadlock is
reported.
The whole series is based on current master branch of tip tree:
a35205980288 ("Merge branch 'WIP.x86/fpu'")
, and I also put it at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/boqun/linux.git arr-rfc-v3
The whole series consists of 14 patches:
1. Do a clean up on the return value of __bfs() and its friends.
2. Make __bfs() able to visit every dependency until a match is
found. The old version of __bfs() could only visit each lock
class once, and this is insufficient if we are going to add
recursive read locks into the dependency graph.
3. Redefine LOCK*_STATE*, now LOCK*_STATE_RR stand for recursive
read lock only and LOCK*_STATE stand for write lock and
non-recursive read lock.
4-5 Extend __bfs() to be able to traverse the stong dependency
patchs after recursive read locks added into the graph.
6-8 Adjust check_redundant(), check_noncircular() and
check_irq_usage() with recursive read locks into consideration.
9. Finally add recursive read locks into the dependency graph.
10-11 Adjust lock cache chain key generation with recursive read locks
into consideration, and provide a test case.
12-13 Add more test cases.
14. Revert commit d82fed752942 ("locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix
mixed read-write ABBA tests"),
This series passed all the lockdep selftest cases(including those I
introduce). Will play more other tests, and in the meanwhile hope to
hear your thoughts about this.
Test and comments are welcome!
Regards,
Boqun
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-25 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-25 22:18 Boqun Feng [this message]
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 01/14] lockdep: Demagic the return value of BFS Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 02/14] lockdep: Make __bfs() visit every dependency until a match Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 03/14] lockdep: Redefine LOCK_*_STATE* bits Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 04/14] lockdep: Introduce lock_list::dep Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 05/14] lockdep: Extend __bfs() to work with multiple kinds of dependencies Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 06/14] lockdep: Support deadlock detection for recursive read in check_noncircular() Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 07/14] lockdep: Adjust check_redundant() for recursive read change Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 08/14] lockdep: Fix recursive read lock related safe->unsafe detection Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 09/14] lockdep: Add recursive read locks into dependency graph Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 10/14] lockdep/selftest: Add a R-L/L-W test case specific to chain cache behavior Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 11/14] lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 12/14] lockdep/selftest: Unleash irq_read_recursion2 and add more Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 13/14] lockdep/selftest: Add more recursive read related test cases Boqun Feng
2017-09-25 22:18 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v3 14/14] Revert "locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests" Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170925221848.6646-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®