mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
	tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
	patrickc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:22:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019142244.7aaqyc3hizzt7n7p@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018152447.b6scwbbmulrfzymw@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:24:47PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > The existing wait_for_tpm_stat() polls for the chip status after
> > 5msec sleep. As per TCG ddwg input, it is expected that tpm might
> > return status in few usec. So, reducing the delay in polling to
> > 1msec.
> > Similarly, get_burstcount() function sleeps for 5msec before
> > retrying for next query to burstcount in a loop. If it takes
> > lesser time for TPM to return, this 5msec delay is longer than
> > necessary.
> > 
> > After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte
> > burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~14sec to ~9sec.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-19 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-17 20:32 [PATCH v4 0/4] additional TPM performance improvements Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] tpm: move wait_for_tpm_stat() to respective driver files Nayna Jain
2017-10-19 14:21   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 17:00     ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20  8:56       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-23 13:32         ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-24 13:45           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance Nayna Jain
2017-10-18 15:25   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 14:42   ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-23  2:57     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-07 18:29     ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-08 11:32       ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-16 14:34       ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-22  6:52       ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-23 14:47         ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-23 16:19           ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-26 15:22           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-26 16:37             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-27  7:08               ` Leendert van Doorn
2017-11-27 13:22                 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-28 20:19                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core Nayna Jain
2017-10-18 15:24   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:22     ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] tpm: use tpm_msleep() value as max delay Nayna Jain
2017-10-19 14:22   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171019142244.7aaqyc3hizzt7n7p@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=patrickc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome