From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KGDB/KDB treats WARN*() as Oops on x86 since 4.12
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171110061550.rgxdy7tmh4ksf4mt@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOi1vP_+G2-T046uLOgbYAccM+6PqfP0+Fc-pR5CzObAq+13dQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Thompson
> <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 09/10/17 13:24, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jason,
> >>
> >> Starting with 4.12, WARN*() is implemented with ud0, generating an
> >> Invalid Opcode exception. KGDB/KDB gets entered as if it were an Oops,
> >> making KGDB/KDB rather hard to use, particularly on testing kernels.
> >>
> >> Alexander posted a fix a while back, but Peter seems to be waiting for
> >> your ack. Could you please weigh in?
> >>
> >> [PATCH] x86/debug: Handle warnings before the notifier chain
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9859065/
> >
> >
> > Hmnnn... IIRC arm64 code has been also been blocked for a couple of releases
> > whilst Will D. waited for an ack that never came.
> >
> > My own reading of the code is that the patch in question restores the status
> > quo, that there will still be mechanisms to provoke entry to kdb/kgdb during
> > a warning (breakpoint on __warn, engage panic_on_warn, etc) and that these
> > are not obviously recursive[1].
> >
> > Put another way I'm happy to dig the patch out of my mail archive and throw
> > in an Acked-By: but since I have no official role within kdb/kgdb (I'm just
> > an interested bystander) it might not be enough for Peter.
> >
> >
> > Daniel.
> >
> >
> > [1] I'm not a huge x86 expert so correct me if I am wrong but I think
> > its ok for us to trap here providing its for a different reason.
>
> Hi Peter, Ingo,
>
> Could you please consider taking Alexander's patch for 4.15? Jason
> never replied to any of our pings and hasn't been actively involved
> with kgdb recently. In the meantime, this regression makes running
> e.g. xfstests runs with kgdb enabled pretty much impossible.
Ok, agreed, I picked the fix up into tip:x86/urgent, with a -stable backporting
tag, and will try to get it to Linus for v4.15 (it will also get backported to
v4.14 which is affected as well).
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 12:24 Ilya Dryomov
2017-10-13 14:59 ` Daniel Thompson
2017-11-09 19:08 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-11-10 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171110061550.rgxdy7tmh4ksf4mt@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome