From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jan H. Schönherr" <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
"KarimAllah Ahmed" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: simplify kvm_mwait_in_guest()
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:23:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129212343.23167-4-rkrcmar@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129212343.23167-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
If Intel/AMD implements MWAIT, we expect that it works well and only
reject known bugs; no reason to do it the other way around for minor
vendors. (Not that they are relevant ATM.)
This allows further simplification of kvm_mwait_in_guest().
And use boot_cpu_has() instead of "cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data," while at it.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index d15859ec5e92..c69f973111cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -265,18 +265,8 @@ static inline u64 nsec_to_cycles(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 nsec)
static inline bool kvm_mwait_in_guest(void)
{
- if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
- return false;
-
- switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
- case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
- /* All AMD CPUs have a working MWAIT implementation */
- return true;
- case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
- return !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
- default:
- return false;
- }
+ return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) &&
+ !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
}
#endif
--
2.14.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 21:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: kvm_mwait_in_guest() cleanup Radim Krčmář
2017-11-29 21:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: prevent MWAIT in guest with buggy MONITOR Radim Krčmář
2017-11-29 21:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: drop bogus MWAIT check Radim Krčmář
2017-11-29 21:23 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-11-30 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: kvm_mwait_in_guest() cleanup Borislav Petkov
2017-11-30 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171129212343.23167-4-rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®