From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / runtime: Fix handling of suppliers with disabled runtime PM
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:18:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201141801.GA20189@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532136.s6buYvDjaS@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:58:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Prevent rpm_get_suppliers() from returning an error code if runtime
> PM is disabled for one or more of the supplier devices it wants to
> runtime-resume, so as to make runtime PM work for devices with links
> to suppliers that don't use runtime PM (such links may be created
> during device enumeration even before it is known whether or not
> runtime PM will be enabled for the devices in question, for example).
>
> Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Fixes: 21d5c57b3726 (PM / runtime: Use device links)
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,8 @@ static int rpm_get_suppliers(struct devi
> continue;
>
> retval = pm_runtime_get_sync(link->supplier);
> - if (retval < 0) {
> + /* Ignore suppliers with disabled runtime PM. */
> + if (retval < 0 && retval != -EACCES) {
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(link->supplier);
> return retval;
> }
>
You could alternatively call pm_runtime_get_sync() under the condition
link->supplier->power.disable_depth > 0 but then the usage_count wouldn't
be incremented and I guess we want that in case runtime PM is only
temporarily disabled and later enabled, right?
I'm wondering if checking for that condition in lieu of retval != -EACCES
would be more explicit and less fragile here (there's a theoretical
possibility that the supplier's ->runtime_resume callback returns -EACCESS,
leading to a false positive).
Apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 13:58 Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 14:18 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2017-12-01 14:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 14:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-04 11:51 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-12-07 19:48 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171201141801.GA20189@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®