From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / runtime: Fix handling of suppliers with disabled runtime PM
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 15:29:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5094556.AJdJzoj6qp@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201141801.GA20189@wunner.de>
On Friday, December 1, 2017 3:18:01 PM CET Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:58:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Prevent rpm_get_suppliers() from returning an error code if runtime
> > PM is disabled for one or more of the supplier devices it wants to
> > runtime-resume, so as to make runtime PM work for devices with links
> > to suppliers that don't use runtime PM (such links may be created
> > during device enumeration even before it is known whether or not
> > runtime PM will be enabled for the devices in question, for example).
> >
> > Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> > Fixes: 21d5c57b3726 (PM / runtime: Use device links)
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > @@ -276,7 +276,8 @@ static int rpm_get_suppliers(struct devi
> > continue;
> >
> > retval = pm_runtime_get_sync(link->supplier);
> > - if (retval < 0) {
> > + /* Ignore suppliers with disabled runtime PM. */
> > + if (retval < 0 && retval != -EACCES) {
> > pm_runtime_put_noidle(link->supplier);
> > return retval;
> > }
> >
>
> You could alternatively call pm_runtime_get_sync() under the condition
> link->supplier->power.disable_depth > 0 but then the usage_count wouldn't
> be incremented and I guess we want that in case runtime PM is only
> temporarily disabled and later enabled, right?
>
> I'm wondering if checking for that condition in lieu of retval != -EACCES
> would be more explicit and less fragile here (there's a theoretical
> possibility that the supplier's ->runtime_resume callback returns -EACCESS,
> leading to a false positive).
That will be filtered out by rpm_callback() which converts -EACCES to -EIO.
>
> Apart from that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 13:58 Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 14:18 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-12-01 14:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-12-01 14:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-04 11:51 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-12-07 19:48 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5094556.AJdJzoj6qp@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®