mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, kernel-team@fb.com, osandov@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:01:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212170110.GE3919388@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c52269a-d5a9-d13c-bdb6-8f47cdaed982@oracle.com>

Hello, Jianchao.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:09:32PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> > @@ -786,18 +779,6 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> >  	const struct blk_mq_ops *ops = req->q->mq_ops;
> >  	enum blk_eh_timer_return ret = BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We know that complete is set at this point. If STARTED isn't set
> > -	 * anymore, then the request isn't active and the "timeout" should
> > -	 * just be ignored. This can happen due to the bitflag ordering.
> > -	 * Timeout first checks if STARTED is set, and if it is, assumes
> > -	 * the request is active. But if we race with completion, then
> > -	 * both flags will get cleared. So check here again, and ignore
> > -	 * a timeout event with a request that isn't active.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (!test_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &req->atomic_flags))
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	if (ops->timeout)
> >  		ret = ops->timeout(req, reserved);
>
> The BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER case has not been covered here. In that case,
> the timer will be re-armed, but the gstate and aborted_gstate are
> not updated and still equal with echo other.  Consequently, when the
> request is completed later, the __blk_mq_complete_request() will be
> missed, then the request will expire again. The aborted_gstate
> should be updated in the BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER case.

You're right.  This is inherently racy tho.  Nothing prevented the
command from completing before complete was cleared.  I'll just clear
aborted_gstate which should behave the same way.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-09 19:25 [PATCHSET] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU Tejun Heo
2017-12-13  3:10   ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 10:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 18:02     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 10:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 18:03     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 11:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 18:04     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: use blk_mq_rq_state() instead of testing REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: make blk_abort_request() trigger timeout path Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE usages from blk-mq Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 10:09   ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-12 17:01     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-12-12 17:26     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-13  3:05       ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-13 16:09         ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-14  2:14           ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-12 11:17   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-12 17:29     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-11  9:27 ` [PATCHSET] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12  9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-12 16:39   ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 19:01 [PATCHSET v2] " Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 22:20   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-12 22:22     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212170110.GE3919388@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome