mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@gmail.com>,
	Josh Poulson <jopoulso@microsoft.com>,
	Mihai Costache <v-micos@microsoft.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org, KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 4.15.0-rc3 APIC causes lockups on Core 2 Duo laptop
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:22:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171229122201.GG10658@chirva-slack.chirva-slack> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171229114915.GF10658@chirva-slack.chirva-slack>

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 06:49:15AM -0500, Alexandru Chirvasitu wrote:
> All right, I tried to do some more digging around, in the hope of
> getting as close to the source of the problem as I can.
> 
> I went back to the very first commit that went astray for me, 2db1f95
> (which is the only one actually panicking), and tried to move from its
> parent 90ad9e2 (that boots fine) to it gradually, altering the code in
> small chunks.
> 
> I tried to ignore the stuff that clearly shouldn't make a difference,
> such as definitions. So in the end I get defined-but-unused-function
> errors in my compilations, but I'm ignoring those for now. Some
> results:
> 
> (1) When I move from the good commit 90ad9e2 according to the attached
> bad-diff (which moves partly towards 2db1f95), I get a panic.
> 
> (2) On the other hand, when I further change this last panicking
> commit by simply doing
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>     removed activate / deactivate from x86_vector_domain_ops
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index 7317ba5a..063594d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -514,8 +514,6 @@ void x86_vector_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, struct irq_domain *d,
>  static const struct irq_domain_ops x86_vector_domain_ops = {
>         .alloc          = x86_vector_alloc_irqs,
>         .free           = x86_vector_free_irqs,
> -       .activate       = x86_vector_activate,
> -       .deactivate     = x86_vector_deactivate,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS
>         .debug_show     = x86_vector_debug_show,
>  #endif
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> all is well. 
> 

And sure enough, simply diffing

----------------------------------------------------------------
    removed activate / deactivate from x86_vector_domain_ops

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index 3f53572..e6cb55d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -511,8 +511,6 @@ void x86_vector_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, struct irq_domain *d,
 static const struct irq_domain_ops x86_vector_domain_ops = {
        .alloc          = x86_vector_alloc_irqs,
        .free           = x86_vector_free_irqs,
-       .activate       = x86_vector_activate,
-       .deactivate     = x86_vector_deactivate,
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS
        .debug_show     = x86_vector_debug_show,
 #endif
----------------------------------------------------------------

directly against 2db1f95 fixes the issues (no freezes, lockups, or
panics).




> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, Alexandru Chirvasitu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:36:37AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, Alexandru Chirvasitu wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Attached, but heads up on this: when redirecting the output of lspci
> > > > > -vvv to a text file as root I get
> > > > > 
> > > > > pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Input/output error
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can find bugs filed for various distros to this same effect, but
> > > > > haven't tracked down any explanations.
> > > > 
> > > > Weird, but the info looks complete.
> > > > 
> > > > Can you please add 'pci=nomsi' to the 4.15 kernel command line and see
> > > > whether that works?
> > > 
> > > It does (emailing from that successful boot as we speak). I'm on a
> > > clean 4.15-rc5 (as in no patches, etc.). 
> > > 
> > > This was also suggested way at the top of this thread by Dexuan Cui
> > > for 4.15-rc3 (where this exchange started), and it worked back then
> > > too.
> > 
> > I missed that part of the conversation. Let me stare into the MSI code
> > again.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	tglx

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> index aaf8d28..1e9bd28 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> @@ -101,12 +101,8 @@
>  #define POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR	0xf0
>  #endif
>  
> -/*
> - * Local APIC timer IRQ vector is on a different priority level,
> - * to work around the 'lost local interrupt if more than 2 IRQ
> - * sources per level' errata.
> - */
> -#define LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR		0xef
> +#define MANAGED_IRQ_SHUTDOWN_VECTOR	0xef
> +#define LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR		0xee
>  
>  #define NR_VECTORS			 256
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index f08d44f..7317ba5a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ struct apic_chip_data {
>  	unsigned int		prev_cpu;
>  	unsigned int		irq;
>  	struct hlist_node	clist;
> -	u8			move_in_progress : 1;
> +	unsigned int		move_in_progress	: 1,
> +				is_managed		: 1;
>  };
>  
>  struct irq_domain *x86_vector_domain;
> @@ -152,6 +153,28 @@ static void apic_update_vector(struct irq_data *irqd, unsigned int newvec,
>  	per_cpu(vector_irq, newcpu)[newvec] = desc;
>  }
>  
> +static void vector_assign_managed_shutdown(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> +
> +	apic_update_irq_cfg(irqd, MANAGED_IRQ_SHUTDOWN_VECTOR, cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static int reserve_managed_vector(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +	const struct cpumask *affmsk = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(irqd);
> +	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
> +	apicd->is_managed = true;
> +	ret = irq_matrix_reserve_managed(vector_matrix, affmsk);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
> +	trace_vector_reserve_managed(irqd->irq, ret);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int allocate_vector(struct irq_data *irqd, const struct cpumask *dest)
>  {
>  	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> @@ -211,9 +234,58 @@ static int assign_irq_vector_policy(struct irq_data *irqd,
>  	return assign_irq_vector(irqd, cpu_online_mask);
>  }
>  
> +
> +static int assign_irq_vector_any_locked(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +  int node = irq_data_get_node(irqd);
> +
> +  if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> +    if (!assign_vector_locked(irqd, cpumask_of_node(node)))
> +      return 0;
> +  }
> +  return assign_vector_locked(irqd, cpu_online_mask);
> +}
> +
> +static int assign_irq_vector_any(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +  unsigned long flags;
> +  int ret;
> +
> +  raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
> +  ret = assign_irq_vector_any_locked(irqd);
> +  raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
> +  return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int assign_managed_vector(struct irq_data *irqd, const struct cpumask *dest)
> +{
> +  const struct cpumask *affmsk = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(irqd);
> +  struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> +  int vector, cpu;
> +
> +  cpumask_and(vector_searchmask, vector_searchmask, affmsk);
> +  cpu = cpumask_first(vector_searchmask);
> +  if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> +    return -EINVAL;
> +  /* set_affinity might call here for nothing */
> +  if (apicd->vector && cpumask_test_cpu(apicd->cpu, vector_searchmask))
> +    return 0;
> +  vector = irq_matrix_alloc_managed(vector_matrix, cpu);
> +  trace_vector_alloc_managed(irqd->irq, vector, vector);
> +  if (vector < 0)
> +    return vector;
> +  apic_update_vector(irqd, vector, cpu);
> +  apic_update_irq_cfg(irqd, vector, cpu);
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +
>  static void clear_irq_vector(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  {
>  	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> +	bool managed = irqd_affinity_is_managed(irqd);
>  	unsigned int vector = apicd->vector;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vector_lock);
> @@ -240,6 +312,80 @@ static void clear_irq_vector(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  	hlist_del_init(&apicd->clist);
>  }
>  
> +static void x86_vector_deactivate(struct irq_domain *dom, struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	trace_vector_deactivate(irqd->irq, apicd->is_managed,
> +				false, false);
> +
> +	if (apicd->is_managed)
> +		return;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
> +	clear_irq_vector(irqd);
> +	vector_assign_managed_shutdown(irqd);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int activate_managed(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +	const struct cpumask *dest = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(irqd);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cpumask_and(vector_searchmask, dest, cpu_online_mask);
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(vector_searchmask))) {
> +		/* Something in the core code broke! Survive gracefully */
> +		pr_err("Managed startup for irq %u, but no CPU\n", irqd->irq);
> +		return EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = assign_managed_vector(irqd, vector_searchmask);
> +	/*
> +	 * This should not happen. The vector reservation got buggered.  Handle
> +	 * it gracefully.
> +	 */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0)) {
> +		pr_err("Managed startup irq %u, no vector available\n",
> +		       irqd->irq);
> +	}
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int x86_vector_activate(struct irq_domain *dom, struct irq_data *irqd,
> +			       bool early)
> +{
> +	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	trace_vector_activate(irqd->irq, apicd->is_managed,
> +				false, early);
> +
> +	if (!apicd->is_managed)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
> +	if (early || irqd_is_managed_and_shutdown(irqd))
> +		vector_assign_managed_shutdown(irqd);
> +	else
> +		ret = activate_managed(irqd);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vector_free_reserved_and_managed(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> +	const struct cpumask *dest = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(irqd);
> +	struct apic_chip_data *apicd = apic_chip_data(irqd);
> +
> +	trace_vector_teardown(irqd->irq, apicd->is_managed, false);
> +
> +	if (apicd->is_managed)
> +		irq_matrix_remove_managed(vector_matrix, dest);
> +}
> +
>  static void x86_vector_free_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
>  				 unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
>  {
> @@ -368,6 +514,8 @@ void x86_vector_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, struct irq_domain *d,
>  static const struct irq_domain_ops x86_vector_domain_ops = {
>  	.alloc		= x86_vector_alloc_irqs,
>  	.free		= x86_vector_free_irqs,
> +	.activate	= x86_vector_activate,
> +	.deactivate	= x86_vector_deactivate,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS
>  	.debug_show	= x86_vector_debug_show,
>  #endif
> @@ -577,6 +725,15 @@ static void free_moved_vector(struct apic_chip_data *apicd)
>  {
>  	unsigned int vector = apicd->prev_vector;
>  	unsigned int cpu = apicd->prev_cpu;
> +	bool managed = apicd->is_managed;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This should never happen. Managed interrupts are not
> +	 * migrated except on CPU down, which does not involve the
> +	 * cleanup vector. But try to keep the accounting correct
> +	 * nevertheless.
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(managed);
>  
>  	trace_vector_free_moved(apicd->irq, vector, false);
>  	irq_matrix_free(vector_matrix, cpu, vector, false);

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-29 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20171218082011.GA24638@arch-chirva.localdomain>
2017-12-18 10:11 ` Pavel Machek
2017-12-19  8:34   ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-20  0:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-20  3:58       ` Dou Liyang
2017-12-20 13:19         ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-20 19:45           ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-21  2:23             ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-22 10:28               ` Dou Liyang
     [not found]                 ` <20171222142053.3cbhi2nhh24w7yoo@D-69-91-141-110.dhcp4.washington.edu>
2017-12-22 21:31                   ` Dexuan Cui
     [not found]                     ` <20171222222917.GA1138@arch-chirva.localdomain>
2017-12-23  1:35                       ` Dexuan Cui
2017-12-23  4:51                         ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-23 13:32                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-23 20:01                           ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-27  8:14                             ` Dou Liyang
2017-12-27 16:18                               ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
     [not found]                                 ` <20171227195007.GF1410@arch-chirva.localdomain>
2017-12-27 23:13                                   ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28  2:06                                 ` Dou Liyang
2017-12-28  2:51                                   ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 10:23                                     ` Dou Liyang
2017-12-24  3:29                           ` Dou Liyang
2017-12-28 11:00           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 14:21             ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 14:48               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 15:48                 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 16:05                   ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 16:10                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 17:22                       ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 17:29                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 17:50                           ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 18:32                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 21:54                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 22:50                                 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 22:57                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 23:19                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 23:30                                       ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 23:36                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 23:59                                           ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-29  8:07                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-29 11:49                                               ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-29 12:22                                                 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu [this message]
2017-12-29 13:09                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-29 14:06                                                   ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-29  0:15                                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-29  0:38                                           ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-28 11:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 19:01             ` Dexuan Cui
2017-12-28 20:14               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 17:17 IRQ behaivour has been changed from v4.14 to v4.15-rc1 Shevchenko, Andriy
2017-12-28 17:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 17:34   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-28 17:44     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 19:31       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-28 19:36         ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-28 20:18         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 21:03           ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-28 21:31             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 21:59               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-29 12:06                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-29 13:10                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-29 14:27                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-29 20:20                     ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq/msi, x86/vector: Prevent reservation mode for non maskable MSI tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-28 17:23 ` IRQ behaivour has been changed from v4.14 to v4.15-rc1 Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171229122201.GG10658@chirva-slack.chirva-slack \
    --to=achirvasub@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jopoulso@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mikpelinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sixiao@microsoft.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=v-micos@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®