mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	avagin@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, sramana@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:20:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109042016.GR9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180109034211.GC3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:42:11PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Paul.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:31:27PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > +static int __init rcu_init_wq_rescuer(void)
> > +{
> > +	WARN_ON(init_rescuer(rcu_gp_workqueue));
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +core_initcall(rcu_init_wq_rescuer);
> 
> So, what I don't get is why RCU needs to call this explicitly.
> core_initcall() is after workqueue_init() anyway.  Why am I missing?

Me being stupid, I guess.

OK, so I can put WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on the early boot creation of RCU's
workqueue_struct as shown below, right?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 9884a945a65837cda6de2ff621d47c59a6ca3e28
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Jan 8 14:35:52 2018 -0800

    rcu: Create RCU-specific workqueues with rescuers
    
    RCU's expedited grace periods can participate in out-of-memory deadlocks
    due to all available system_wq kthreads being blocked and there not being
    memory available to create more.  This commit prevents such deadlocks
    by allocating an RCU-specific workqueue_struct at early boot time, and
    providing it with a rescuer to ensure forward progress.  This uses the
    shiny new init_rescuer() function provided by Tejun (but indirectly).
    
    This commit also causes SRCU to use this new RCU-specific
    workqueue_struct.  Note that SRCU's use of workqueues never blocks them
    waiting for readers, so this should be safe from a forward-progress
    viewpoint.
    
    Reported-by: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>
    Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index 59c471de342a..acabc4781b08 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ void show_rcu_gp_kthreads(void);
 void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void);
 void rcu_bh_force_quiescent_state(void);
 void rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state(void);
+extern struct workqueue_struct *rcu_gp_workqueue;
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 6d5880089ff6..89f0f6b3ce9a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static bool srcu_queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  */
 static void srcu_schedule_cbs_sdp(struct srcu_data *sdp, unsigned long delay)
 {
-	srcu_queue_delayed_work_on(sdp->cpu, system_power_efficient_wq,
+	srcu_queue_delayed_work_on(sdp->cpu, rcu_gp_workqueue,
 				   &sdp->work, delay);
 }
 
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static void srcu_funnel_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct srcu_data *sdp,
 	    rcu_seq_state(sp->srcu_gp_seq) == SRCU_STATE_IDLE) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(ULONG_CMP_GE(sp->srcu_gp_seq, sp->srcu_gp_seq_needed));
 		srcu_gp_start(sp);
-		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sp->work,
+		queue_delayed_work(rcu_gp_workqueue, &sp->work,
 				   srcu_get_delay(sp));
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(sp, flags);
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static void srcu_reschedule(struct srcu_struct *sp, unsigned long delay)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(sp);
 
 	if (pushgp)
-		queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sp->work, delay);
+		queue_delayed_work(rcu_gp_workqueue, &sp->work, delay);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f9c0ca2ccf0c..d658538e6f7d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4272,6 +4272,8 @@ static void __init rcu_dump_rcu_node_tree(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	pr_cont("\n");
 }
 
+struct workqueue_struct *rcu_gp_workqueue;
+
 void __init rcu_init(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -4298,6 +4300,10 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 		rcu_cpu_starting(cpu);
 		rcutree_online_cpu(cpu);
 	}
+
+	/* Create workqueue for expedited GPs and for Tree SRCU. */
+	rcu_gp_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+	WARN_ON(!rcu_gp_workqueue);
 }
 
 #include "tree_exp.h"
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 46d61b597731..3ba3ef4d4796 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static void _synchronize_rcu_expedited(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 		rew.rew_rsp = rsp;
 		rew.rew_s = s;
 		INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&rew.rew_work, wait_rcu_exp_gp);
-		schedule_work(&rew.rew_work);
+		queue_work(rcu_gp_workqueue, &rew.rew_work);
 	}
 
 	/* Wait for expedited grace period to complete. */

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-09  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CANaxB-zT+sz=z1FFk5npnwMySdfKCBZDkM+P+=JXDkCXbh=rCw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-28 11:35 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-04  5:14   ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-04 20:22     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 22:58       ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 23:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08  9:40           ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-08 11:45             ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-11 15:32               ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-13 14:28                 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13 15:40                   ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15  8:54                     ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-15 13:22                       ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 19:06                         ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-19  7:26                           ` [PATCH] cgroup: Fix deadlock in cpu hotplug path Prateek Sood
2017-12-19 13:39                             ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-11 15:20           ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Tejun Heo
2017-12-13  7:50             ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13 16:06               ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 19:04                 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-28 20:37                 ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-02 16:16                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-02 17:44                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-02 18:01                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-08 12:28                         ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47                           ` [PATCH wq/for-4.16 1/2] workqueue: separate out init_rescuer() Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47                             ` [PATCH wq/for-4.16 2/2] workqueue: allow WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on early init workqueues Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:52                           ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09  0:31                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09  3:42                               ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09  4:20                                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-01-09 13:44                                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 15:21                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 15:37                                       ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 16:00                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 20:08                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 21:41                                             ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-10 22:10                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-15 12:02                     ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-16 16:27                       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180109042016.GR9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prsood@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome