From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/35] objtool: More complex static jump implementation
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:48:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118140152.362136775@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118134800.711245485@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-objtool-fancy.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3333 bytes --]
When using something like:
-#define sched_feat(x) (static_branch_##x(&sched_feat_keys[__SCHED_FEAT_##x]))
+#define sched_feat(x) (static_branch_##x(&sched_feat_keys[__SCHED_FEAT_##x]) && \
+ (arch_static_assert(), true))
we get an objtool assertion fail like:
kernel/sched/fair.o: warning: objtool: hrtick_update()+0xd: static assert FAIL
where:
0000000000001140 <hrtick_update>:
1140: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
1145: c3 retq
1146: 48 8b b7 30 09 00 00 mov 0x930(%rdi),%rsi
114d: 8b 87 d8 09 00 00 mov 0x9d8(%rdi),%eax
1153: 48 0f a3 05 00 00 00 bt %rax,0x0(%rip) # 115b <hrtick_update+0x1b>
115a: 00
1157: R_X86_64_PC32 __cpu_active_mask-0x4
and:
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [__jump_table]:
0000000000000150 R_X86_64_64 .text+0x0000000000001140
0000000000000158 R_X86_64_64 .text+0x0000000000001146
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.discard.jump_assert]:
0000000000000028 R_X86_64_64 .text+0x000000000000114d
IOW, GCC managed to place the assertion 1 instruction _after_ the
static jump target (it lifted a load over it).
So while the code generation is fine, the assertion gets placed wrong.
We can 'fix' this by not only considering the immediate static jump
locations but also all the unconditional code after it, terminating
the basic block on any unconditional instruction or branch entry
point.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/objtool/check.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -520,6 +520,8 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
dest_off);
return -1;
}
+
+ insn->jump_dest->branch_target = true;
}
return 0;
@@ -1197,6 +1199,41 @@ static int read_retpoline_hints(struct o
return 0;
}
+static int grow_static_blocks(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct instruction *insn;
+ bool static_block = false;
+
+ for_each_insn(file, insn) {
+ if (!static_block && !insn->static_jump_dest)
+ continue;
+
+ if (insn->static_jump_dest) {
+ static_block = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (insn->branch_target) {
+ static_block = false;
+ continue;
+ } else switch (insn->type) {
+ case INSN_JUMP_CONDITIONAL:
+ case INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL:
+ case INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC:
+ case INSN_CALL:
+ case INSN_CALL_DYNAMIC:
+ case INSN_RETURN:
+ case INSN_BUG:
+ static_block = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ insn->static_jump_dest = static_block;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int decode_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
{
int ret;
@@ -1239,6 +1276,10 @@ static int decode_sections(struct objtoo
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = grow_static_blocks(file);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
return 0;
}
--- a/tools/objtool/check.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct instruction {
unsigned char type;
unsigned long immediate;
bool alt_group, visited, dead_end, ignore, hint, save, restore, ignore_alts;
- bool static_jump_dest, retpoline_safe;
+ bool static_jump_dest, retpoline_safe, branch_target;
struct symbol *call_dest;
struct instruction *jump_dest;
struct list_head alts;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-18 13:48 [PATCH 00/35] jump_label, objtool, IBRS and IBPB Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 01/35] jump_label: Add branch hints to static_branch_{un,}likely() Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 02/35] sched: Optimize ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 03/35] x86: Reindent _static_cpu_has Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 04/35] x86: Update _static_cpu_has to use all named variables Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 05/35] x86: Add a type field to alt_instr Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 06/35] objtool: Implement base jump_assert support Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 07/35] x86: Annotate static_cpu_has alternative Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 08/35] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has() Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 09/35] objtool: Introduce special_type Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 10/35] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert() Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 11/35] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 12/35] x86/paravirt: Annotate indirect calls Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 13/35] x86,nospec: Annotate indirect calls/jumps Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 14/35] x86: Annotate indirect jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 16/35] objtool: Use existing global variables for options Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 17/35] objtool: Even more complex static block checks Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 18/35] objtool: Another static block fail Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-19 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 18:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-29 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 19/35] objtool: Skip static assert when KCOV/KASAN Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 20/35] x86: Force asm-goto Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 16:25 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 21/35] x86: Remove FAST_FEATURE_TESTS Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 22/35] x86/cpufeatures: Detect Speculation control feature Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 23/35] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control code Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 16:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 17:08 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-18 17:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-18 18:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 19:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-18 23:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-18 23:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-19 1:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-19 4:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-19 4:15 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-19 15:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 24/35] x86/msr: Move native_*msr macros out of microcode.h Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 25/35] x86/speculation: Add inlines to control Indirect Branch Speculation Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 26/35] x86/enter: Create macros to stop/restart " Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 19:44 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 27/35] x86/enter: Use IBRS on syscall and interrupts Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 28/35] x86/idle: Control Indirect Branch Speculation in idle Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 19:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 29/35] x86/speculation: Add IPBP support Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 16:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 18:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 18:35 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 30/35] x86/speculation: Use Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier in context switch Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-19 0:38 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-19 4:03 ` Kevin Easton
2018-01-19 20:26 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 31/35] x86/ibrs: Add new helper macros to save/restore MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 32/35] x86/vmx: Direct access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 33/35] x86/svm: " Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 34/35] x86/kvm: Add IBPB support Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-19 15:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-19 16:08 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-19 16:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-19 16:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH 35/35] x86/nospec: Add static assertions Peter Zijlstra, Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180118140152.362136775@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®