From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: add new data structures for free running counters
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:17:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180124101721.GQ2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07753803C1E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:00:58PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:24:17PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Oh, think a bit more.
> > > > I think we cannot do the same thing as we did for CPU PMU's fixed
> > counters.
> > > >
> > > > The counters here are free running counters. They cannot be start/stop.
> > >
> > > Yes free running counter have completely different semantics. They
> > > need a separate event code.
> >
> > The only thing that matters is if they count the same thing or not.
> >
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> There is NO event available on the GPs, that is exactly the same as
> the free-running counters.
>
> For example, the BW free-running counters count the requests associated
> with writes and completions.
> The most similar events on the GPs are DATA_REQ_{OF,BY}_CPU.* events.
> Except that some of their sub-events count requests which not completions.
> There are also other minor differences.
> So we don't have alternative events for the free-running counters.
> I think we have to use 0xff.
OK, but explicitly mention this as the reason for having to invent event
codes. Them being fixed purpose or free running isn't a valid reason for
that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-15 18:57 [PATCH V5 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: customized event_read for client IMC uncore kan.liang
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 2/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: correct fixed counter index check for NHM kan.liang
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 3/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: correct fixed counter index check in generic code kan.liang
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 4/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: add new data structures for free running counters kan.liang
2018-01-18 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 17:43 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-19 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-19 15:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-19 17:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-19 17:34 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-19 17:53 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-19 17:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-19 18:00 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-19 20:18 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-19 20:24 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-19 20:50 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-19 20:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-20 1:24 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-19 21:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 22:00 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-24 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-24 15:46 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 5/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: add infrastructure for free running counter kan.liang
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 6/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: SKX support for IIO free running counters kan.liang
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 7/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: expose uncore_pmu_event functions kan.liang
2018-01-15 18:57 ` [PATCH V5 8/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: clean up client IMC uncore kan.liang
2018-01-18 9:36 ` [PATCH V5 1/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: customized event_read for " Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180124101721.GQ2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome