From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Use a recently used CPU as an idle candidate and the basis for SIS
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:40:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180130134049.GU2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180130132527.tjc6vea76sm5zm76@techsingularity.net>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:25:27PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Because, esp. in this scenario; a task migrating; the hardware really
> > can't do anything sensible, whereas the OS _knows_.
>
> Potentially yes. One option without HWP would be to track utilisation
> for a task or artifically boost it for a short period after migration so
> a higher p-state is potentially selected. With HWP, a hint would have to
> be given to the hardware to try select a higher frequency but I've no idea
> how expensive that is or how it would behave on different implementations
> of HWP. It may also be a game of whack-a-mole trying to get every cpufreq
> configuration correct.
We have much of this infrastructure and have been working on improving
it [1]. We already track per task utilization and feed it into a cpufreq
governor (schedutil).
> One advantage of using fewer cores is that it should
> work regardless of cpufreq driver.
Sure, and I started out by saying this patch isn't necessarily bad; but
I think our 'use' [2] of HWP _is_.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180123180847.4477-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
[2] IIRC we basically don't do _anything_ when HWP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 10:45 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce migrations and unnecessary spreading of load to multiple CPUs Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary parameters from wake_affine_idle Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary parameters from wake_affine_idle() tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Restructure wake_affine to return a CPU id Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Restructure wake_affine*() " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate if the prev_cpu is idle Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Use a recently used CPU as an idle candidate and the basis for SIS Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:57 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:25 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-30 14:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 9:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-31 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 11:54 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 17:44 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-01 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 7:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-01 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 13:18 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-02 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 14:54 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-02 19:48 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-02 20:01 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 11:10 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-05 17:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 17:50 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-04 8:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-04 8:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 11:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-03 16:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-05 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-02 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 13:27 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-30 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-30 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:59 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:18 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180130134049.GU2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome