From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Use a recently used CPU as an idle candidate and the basis for SIS
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:46:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180202124647.GK2269@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8930678.7E2iWGoJnn@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:42:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > If you really care you can do async IPIs and do a custom serialization
> > that only waits when you do back-to-back things, which should be fairly
> > uncommon I'd think.
>
> In this particular case we don't want to return to user space before the
> MSR is actually written with the new value.
Why not?
I was thinking of something like the below, which would in fact do
exactly that.
---
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 7edf7a0e5a96..f0caa5cc7adb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <trace/events/power.h>
#include <asm/div64.h>
@@ -767,6 +768,40 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(unsigned int cpu)
wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value);
}
+static void __intel_pstate_hwp_set_desired(int val)
+{
+ u64 value;
+
+ value = rdmsrl(MSR_HWP_REQUEST);
+ value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(23, 16);
+ value |= (val & 0xff) << 16;
+ wrmsrl(MSR_HWP_REQUEST, val);
+}
+
+static void __intel_pstate_hwp_func(void *data)
+{
+ __intel_pstate_hwp_set_desired((int)data);
+}
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct __call_single_data, csd_data);
+
+static void intel_pstate_hwp_set_desired(int cpu, int val)
+{
+ struct call_function_data *csd;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ csd = this_cpu_ptr(&csd_data);
+ /* wait for previous invocation to complete */
+ csd_lock_wait(csd);
+
+ csd->func = __intel_pstate_hwp_func;
+ csd->info = (unsigned long)val;
+
+ smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, csd);
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
+
static int intel_pstate_hwp_save_state(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 9fb239e12b82..2bc125ec6146 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/llist.h>
+enum {
+ CSD_FLAG_LOCK = 0x01,
+ CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS = 0x02,
+};
+
typedef void (*smp_call_func_t)(void *info);
struct __call_single_data {
struct llist_node llist;
@@ -26,6 +31,11 @@ struct __call_single_data {
typedef struct __call_single_data call_single_data_t
__aligned(sizeof(struct __call_single_data));
+static __always_inline void csd_lock_wait(call_single_data_t *csd)
+{
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&csd->flags, !(VAL & CSD_FLAG_LOCK));
+}
+
/* total number of cpus in this system (may exceed NR_CPUS) */
extern unsigned int total_cpus;
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 084c8b3a2681..af0ef9eb7679 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -22,11 +22,6 @@
#include "smpboot.h"
-enum {
- CSD_FLAG_LOCK = 0x01,
- CSD_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS = 0x02,
-};
-
struct call_function_data {
call_single_data_t __percpu *csd;
cpumask_var_t cpumask;
@@ -103,11 +98,6 @@ void __init call_function_init(void)
* previous function call. For multi-cpu calls its even more interesting
* as we'll have to ensure no other cpu is observing our csd.
*/
-static __always_inline void csd_lock_wait(call_single_data_t *csd)
-{
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&csd->flags, !(VAL & CSD_FLAG_LOCK));
-}
-
static __always_inline void csd_lock(call_single_data_t *csd)
{
csd_lock_wait(csd);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 10:45 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce migrations and unnecessary spreading of load to multiple CPUs Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary parameters from wake_affine_idle Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary parameters from wake_affine_idle() tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Restructure wake_affine to return a CPU id Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Restructure wake_affine*() " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Do not migrate if the prev_cpu is idle Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Use a recently used CPU as an idle candidate and the basis for SIS Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:57 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:25 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 14:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 9:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-31 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 11:54 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 17:44 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-01 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 7:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-01 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 13:18 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-02 11:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 14:54 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-02 19:48 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-02 20:01 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 11:10 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-05 17:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 17:50 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-04 8:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-04 8:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 11:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-02-02 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-02-02 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-03 16:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-02-05 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-05 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-02 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-02 13:27 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-30 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-01-30 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 12:59 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-30 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 13:18 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-06 11:56 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180202124647.GK2269@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome