From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@redhat.com, eranian@google.com,
ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] perf/x86/intel: fix event update for auto-reload
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:09:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180209140905.GG25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae4c7aff-da12-8cb3-4fac-4637ab001060@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:58:23PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> > With the exception of handling 'empty' buffers, I ended up with the
> > below. Please try again.
> >
>
> There are two small errors. After fixing them, the patch works well.
Well, it still doesn't do A, two read()s without PEBS record in between.
So that needs fixing. What 3/5 does, call x86_perf_event_update() after
drain_pebs() is actively wrong after this patch.
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Careful, not all hw sign-extends above the physical width
> > + * of the counter.
> > + */
> > + delta = (new_raw_count << shift) - (prev_raw_count << shift);
> > + delta >>= shift;
>
> new_raw_count could be smaller than prev_raw_count.
> The sign bit will be set. The delta>> could be wrong.
>
> I think we can add a period here to prevent it.
> + delta = (period << shift) + (new_raw_count << shift) -
> + (prev_raw_count << shift);
> + delta >>= shift;
> ......
> + local64_add(delta + period * (count - 1), &event->count);
>
Right it does, but that wrecks case A again, because then we get here
with !@count.
Maybe something like:
s64 new, old;
new = ((s64)(new_raw_count << shift) >> shift);
old = ((s64)(old_raw_count << shift) >> shift);
local64_add(new - old + count * period, &event->count);
And then make intel_pmu_drain_pebs_*(), call this function even when !n.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 16:29 [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] perf/x86/intel: fix event update for auto-reload kan.liang
2018-02-06 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-06 17:58 ` Liang, Kan
2018-02-09 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-02-09 15:49 ` Liang, Kan
2018-02-10 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] perf/x86: introduce read function for x86_pmu kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] perf/x86/intel/ds: introduce read function for large pebs kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/x86/intel: fix pmu read for large PEBS kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] perf/x86: fix: disable userspace RDPMC usage " kan.liang
2018-01-30 9:16 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read Stephane Eranian
2018-01-30 13:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 14:59 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 15:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 15:25 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 16:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-30 16:48 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 18:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 19:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-31 3:59 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-31 9:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-31 13:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-31 15:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-31 15:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180209140905.GG25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome