mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:25:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35090c62-466a-aec8-b1a3-69def959c1c6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180130150454.GE29098@krava>



On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since V2:
>>>>>    - Refined the changelog
>>>>>    - Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
>>>>>      The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
>>>>>      Disabled PMU in pmu::read() path for large PEBS.
>>>>>      Handled the corner case when reload_times == 0.
>>>>>    - Modified the parameter of intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload()
>>>>>      Discarded local64_cmpxchg
>>>>>    - Added fixes tag
>>>>>    - Added WARN to handle reload_times == 0 || reload_val == 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since V1:
>>>>>    - Check PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD before call
>>>>>      intel_pmu_save_and_restore()
>>>>
>>>> It is not yet clear to me why PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD is not allowed
>>>> with large PEBS. Large PEBS requires fixed period. So the kernel could
>>>> make up the period from the event and store it in the sampling buffer.
>>>>
>>>> I tried using large PEBS recently, and despite trying different option
>>>> combination of perf record, I was not able to get it to work.
>>>>
>>>> $ perf record  -c 1  -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp
>>>> --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0
>>>>
>>>> But I was able to make this work with a much older kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Another annoyance I ran into is with perf record requiring -c period
>>>> in order not to set
>>>> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD in the event.
>>>>
>>>> If I do:
>>>> perf record  -c 1  -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp
>>>> --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0
>>>>
>>>> I get
>>>>
>>>> perf_event_attr:
>>>>     type                             4
>>>>     size                             112
>>>>     config                           0x10d1
>>>>     { sample_period, sample_freq }   199936
>>>>     sample_type                      IP|TID|CPU
>>>>
>>>> But if I do:
>>>> perf record  -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp
>>>> --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0
>>>>
>>>> I get
>>>>
>>>> perf_event_attr:
>>>>     type                             4
>>>>     size                             112
>>>>     config                           0x10d1
>>>>     { sample_period, sample_freq }   199936
>>>>     sample_type                      IP|TID|CPU|PERIOD
>>>>
>>>> Perf should check if all events have a period=, then it should not
>>>> pass PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, even
>>>> more so when only one event is defined.
>>>>
>>>> Also it does not seem to honor --no-period.
>>>
>>> yep, there's a bug in period=x term handling
>>> we did not re/set the sample_type based on that
>>>
>>> attached patch fixes that for me, also takes into account
>>> the --no/-period options
>>>
>>> jirka
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> index f251e824edac..907267206973 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> @@ -1566,7 +1566,8 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
>>>    	OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('T', "timestamp", &record.opts.sample_time,
>>>    			&record.opts.sample_time_set,
>>>    			"Record the sample timestamps"),
>>> -	OPT_BOOLEAN('P', "period", &record.opts.period, "Record the sample period"),
>>> +	OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('P', "period", &record.opts.period, &record.opts.period_set,
>>> +			"Record the sample period"),
>>>    	OPT_BOOLEAN('n', "no-samples", &record.opts.no_samples,
>>>    		    "don't sample"),
>>>    	OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('N', "no-buildid-cache", &record.no_buildid_cache,
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h
>>> index 2357f4ccc9c7..cfe46236a5e5 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/perf.h
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct record_opts {
>>>    	bool	     sample_time_set;
>>>    	bool	     sample_cpu;
>>>    	bool	     period;
>>> +	bool	     period_set;
>>>    	bool	     running_time;
>>>    	bool	     full_auxtrace;
>>>    	bool	     auxtrace_snapshot_mode;
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>>> index 66fa45198a11..ff359c9ece2e 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>>> @@ -745,12 +745,14 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>>>    			if (!(term->weak && opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)) {
>>>    				attr->sample_period = term->val.period;
>>>    				attr->freq = 0;
>>> +				perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
>>>    			}
>>>    			break;
>>>    		case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_FREQ:
>>>    			if (!(term->weak && opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX)) {
>>>    				attr->sample_freq = term->val.freq;
>>>    				attr->freq = 1;
>>> +				perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
>>>    			}
>>
>> If we do so, some events could be in fixed mode without PERIOD set. Other
>> events could be in freq mode with PERIOD set.
> 
> it also sets the attr->freq, so it's not in fixed mode
> 

I mean the TERM_PERIOD. It probably enable the large PEBS.
 >>>    				attr->freq = 0;
 >>> +				perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);

The events in fixed mode could enable large PEBS. Events in freq mode 
should not enable large PEBS.
I think that could be a problem if some events try to enable large PEBS, 
while others not.

Thanks,
Kan

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-30 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-29 16:29 kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] perf/x86/intel: fix event update for auto-reload kan.liang
2018-02-06 15:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-06 17:58     ` Liang, Kan
2018-02-09 14:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-09 15:49         ` Liang, Kan
2018-02-10 14:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] perf/x86: introduce read function for x86_pmu kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] perf/x86/intel/ds: introduce read function for large pebs kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/x86/intel: fix pmu read for large PEBS kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] perf/x86: fix: disable userspace RDPMC usage " kan.liang
2018-01-30  9:16 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read Stephane Eranian
2018-01-30 13:39   ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 14:59     ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 15:04       ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 15:25         ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2018-01-30 16:36           ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-30 16:48             ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 18:52               ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 19:56                 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-31  3:59                   ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-31  9:15                     ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-31 13:15                       ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-31 15:15                         ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-31 15:41                           ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 14:41   ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35090c62-466a-aec8-b1a3-69def959c1c6@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®