* [RFC PATCH martinbrandenburg] orangefs: orangefs_write_inode() can be static
2018-02-13 20:12 [martinbrandenburg:for-next 13/13] fs/orangefs/super.c:153:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_write_inode' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2018-02-13 20:12 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-02-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Brandenburg; +Cc: kbuild-all, Mike Marshall, devel, linux-kernel
Fixes: 525e7273bc80 ("orangefs: let setattr write to cached inode")
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/orangefs/super.c b/fs/orangefs/super.c
index 49bb1ce..c38310c 100644
--- a/fs/orangefs/super.c
+++ b/fs/orangefs/super.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void orangefs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
call_rcu(&inode->i_rcu, orangefs_i_callback);
}
-int orangefs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
+static int orangefs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
struct iattr iattr;
gossip_debug(GOSSIP_SUPER_DEBUG, "orangefs_write_inode\n");
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [martinbrandenburg:for-next 13/13] fs/orangefs/super.c:153:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_write_inode' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2018-02-13 20:12 kbuild test robot
2018-02-13 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH martinbrandenburg] orangefs: orangefs_write_inode() can be static kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2018-02-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Brandenburg; +Cc: kbuild-all, Mike Marshall, devel, linux-kernel
tree: https://github.com/martinbrandenburg/linux for-next
head: 525e7273bc80995f5bcfdc2780b870aa3ab37a18
commit: 525e7273bc80995f5bcfdc2780b870aa3ab37a18 [13/13] orangefs: let setattr write to cached inode
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 525e7273bc80995f5bcfdc2780b870aa3ab37a18
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/orangefs/super.c:153:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_write_inode' was not declared. Should it be
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-13 20:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-13 20:12 [martinbrandenburg:for-next 13/13] fs/orangefs/super.c:153:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_write_inode' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2018-02-13 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH martinbrandenburg] orangefs: orangefs_write_inode() can be static kbuild test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®