From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/unwind: Make CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y the default in kconfig for 64-bit
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:31:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180319203130.GE37438@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180319192910.wfbi656bxkrlurgf@treble>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2011 bytes --]
El Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:29:10PM -0500 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:57:32AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > El Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:02:01PM -0500 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
> >
> > > The ORC unwinder has been stable in testing so far. Give it much wider
> > > testing by making it the default in kconfig for x86_64. It's not yet
> > > supported for 32-bit, so leave frame pointers as the default there.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Building an upstream kernel with clang results in plenty of objtool
> > warnings like these:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ch7017.o: warning: objtool: ch7017_get_hw_state()+0x80: return with modified stack frame
> > CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_oa_cflgt2.o
> > ...
> > CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lpe_audio.o
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.o: warning: objtool: i915_error_printf()+0x6c: return with modified stack frame
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.o: warning: objtool: pipe_config_err()+0xa6: return with modified stack frame
> >
> > Bisecting shows that the warnings are generated since the ORC unwinder
> > was made the default. Not sure if the issue is on the unwinder side
> > or clang.
> >
> > Any ideas on what could be the problems?
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> The ORC unwinder relies on objtool, which reverse engineers the compiled
> code. This is objtool's first exposure to clang, so I'm not at all
> surprised if it's getting confused.
>
> Send me one of the .o files and I can take a quick look to see how bad
> it is, but I'm guessing it's going to be a lot of work to make objtool
> compatible with clang (and unfortunately I won't have the bandwidth to
> work on that in the near term.)
>
> In the meantime I'd recommend that you use frame pointers (and
> CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=n) for clang-compiled kernels.
Thanks for your assessment!
dvo_ch7017.o is attached.
[-- Attachment #2: dvo_ch7017.o --]
[-- Type: application/x-object, Size: 8960 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20171013052544.euk7yawni47lhmdq@gmail.com>
2017-10-13 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/unwind: Rename unwinder config options to 'CONFIG_UNWINDER_*' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-14 10:49 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-13 20:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/unwind: Make CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y the default in kconfig for 64-bit Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-14 10:50 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-19 16:51 ` [2/2] " Andrei Vagin
2017-10-19 18:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-19 22:35 ` Andrei Vagin
2017-10-20 0:38 ` Andrei Vagin
2017-10-20 1:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-20 6:54 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-03-19 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-19 19:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-19 20:31 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2018-03-19 21:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-19 23:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-20 2:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-20 19:39 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-21 2:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-21 21:19 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180319203130.GE37438@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome