From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [2/2] x86/unwind: Make CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y the default in kconfig for 64-bit
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:51:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019165103.GA15123@outlook.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b1237bbe7244ed9cdf8db2dcb1253e37e1c341e.1507924831.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Hi,
We run CRIU tests for tip/auto-latest regularly, and a few days ago our
test job started to detect this warning in a kernel log:
[ 44.235786] WARNING: can't dereference iret registers at ffff8801c5f17fe0 for ip ffffffff95f0d94b
What does it mean? How critical is it?
Our test job fails if it detects any warning in a kernel log. Maybe we
need to investigate reasons of this warning and try to eliminate it?
Here are logs:
https://travis-ci.org/avagin/linux/jobs/289676634
Thanks,
Andrei
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:02:01PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The ORC unwinder has been stable in testing so far. Give it much wider
> testing by making it the default in kconfig for x86_64. It's not yet
> supported for 32-bit, so leave frame pointers as the default there.
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> index f274dbb87c26..a4ff214fb760 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -358,27 +358,13 @@ config PUNIT_ATOM_DEBUG
>
> choice
> prompt "Choose kernel unwinder"
> - default UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
> + default UNWINDER_ORC if X86_64
> + default UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER if X86_32
> ---help---
> This determines which method will be used for unwinding kernel stack
> traces for panics, oopses, bugs, warnings, perf, /proc/<pid>/stack,
> livepatch, lockdep, and more.
>
> -config UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
> - bool "Frame pointer unwinder"
> - select FRAME_POINTER
> - ---help---
> - This option enables the frame pointer unwinder for unwinding kernel
> - stack traces.
> -
> - The unwinder itself is fast and it uses less RAM than the ORC
> - unwinder, but the kernel text size will grow by ~3% and the kernel's
> - overall performance will degrade by roughly 5-10%.
> -
> - This option is recommended if you want to use the livepatch
> - consistency model, as this is currently the only way to get a
> - reliable stack trace (CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE).
> -
> config UNWINDER_ORC
> bool "ORC unwinder"
> depends on X86_64
> @@ -395,6 +381,21 @@ config UNWINDER_ORC
> Enabling this option will increase the kernel's runtime memory usage
> by roughly 2-4MB, depending on your kernel config.
>
> +config UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
> + bool "Frame pointer unwinder"
> + select FRAME_POINTER
> + ---help---
> + This option enables the frame pointer unwinder for unwinding kernel
> + stack traces.
> +
> + The unwinder itself is fast and it uses less RAM than the ORC
> + unwinder, but the kernel text size will grow by ~3% and the kernel's
> + overall performance will degrade by roughly 5-10%.
> +
> + This option is recommended if you want to use the livepatch
> + consistency model, as this is currently the only way to get a
> + reliable stack trace (CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE).
> +
> config UNWINDER_GUESS
> bool "Guess unwinder"
> depends on EXPERT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20171013052544.euk7yawni47lhmdq@gmail.com>
2017-10-13 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/unwind: Rename unwinder config options to 'CONFIG_UNWINDER_*' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-14 10:49 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-13 20:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/unwind: Make CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y the default in kconfig for 64-bit Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-14 10:50 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-19 16:51 ` Andrei Vagin [this message]
2017-10-19 18:16 ` [2/2] " Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-19 22:35 ` Andrei Vagin
2017-10-20 0:38 ` Andrei Vagin
2017-10-20 1:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-20 6:54 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-03-19 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-19 19:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-19 20:31 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-19 21:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-19 23:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-20 2:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-20 19:39 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2018-03-21 2:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-21 21:19 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171019165103.GA15123@outlook.office365.com \
--to=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®