mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:31:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180328153135.GG13942@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75e5917b-a9ba-c67e-e964-3f002681f9bb@linaro.org>

On 28/03/2018 at 16:36:34 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 28/03/2018 16:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 28/03/2018 at 15:03:11 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 28/03/2018 12:29, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> >>> Hello Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 27. März 2018, 13:30:22 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> >>>> Can you can give a rough amount for the irq rate on the timer ?
> >>>
> >>> I used itop [1] now to get a rough estimate. First with kernel v4.14.29-rt25 
> >>> (fully preempt RT):
> >>>
> >>> INT                NAME          RATE             MAX
> >>>  19 [ vel     tc_clkevt]   397 Ints/s     (max:   432)
> >>>  26 [      vel     eth0]     4 Ints/s     (max:    38)
> >>>
> >>> Next test with kernel v4.15.13 gives (slightly slower, but non-RT):
> >>>
> >>> INT                NAME          RATE             MAX
> >>>  19 [ vel     tc_clkevt]   248 Ints/s     (max:   273)
> >>>  26 [      vel     eth0]     4 Ints/s     (max:    11)
> >>>
> >>> With kernel v4.16-rc7 plus this patch series and tcb as clocksource:
> >>>
> >>> INT                NAME          RATE             MAX
> >>>  17 [vel     timer@fffa]  2164 Ints/s     (max:  2183)
> >>>  26 [      vel     eth0]     5 Ints/s     (max:    10)
> >>>
> >>> Is this the information you wanted? If not, could you point me on how to get 
> >>> the requested irq rate?
> >>
> >> It is perfect. Thanks!
> >>
> >> It confirms what I was worried about: the clocksource wraps up too
> >> quickly thus raising an interrupt every 400us. That is why I asked
> >> Alexande about a prescalar register.
> >>
> > 
> > The code should behave exactly the same between the previous and the new
> > driver. The interrupt is not coming from the clocksource but from the
> > clockevent and it is already on the slowest clock, the 32kHz one.
> 
> Do you have an explanation of why the rate is much higher ?
> 

The core is giving deltas of 31 clocks instead of much more than that, I
guess I messed up the initialization somewhere.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-28 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-23 17:15 Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: at91: add TCB registers definitions Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] clocksource/drivers: Add a new driver for the Atmel ARM TC blocks Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] clocksource/drivers: atmel-pit: make option silent Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: at91: Implement clocksource selection Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: configs: at91: use new TCB timer driver Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: configs: at91: unselect PIT Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-22 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-27 10:41 ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-27 11:30   ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-28 10:29     ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-28 13:03       ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-28 14:16         ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-28 14:36           ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-28 15:31             ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2018-03-28 15:50               ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29  8:01                 ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-29 10:45                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 11:31                     ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-29 11:42                       ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 12:07                         ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-29 13:02                           ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 15:11                   ` Alexander Dahl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180328153135.GG13942@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=ada@thorsis.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome