From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 13:30:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <989df8a3-462a-c645-87f1-9f956e1b22c9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9761072.pX2B0LJlSJ@ada>
On 27/03/2018 12:41, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hello Alexandre,
>
> Am Freitag, 23. Februar 2018, 18:15:52 CEST schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
>> - using the PIT doesn't work well with preempt-rt because its interrupt is
>> shared (in particular with the UART and their interrupt flags are
>> incompatible)
>
> This is actually quite annoying when using the UART as a serial console,
> producing garbage when you type too fast. That's why I tested this patch
> series (on top of v4.16-rc7). Target is a at91sam9g20 based board, quite close
> to, but not actually an at91sam9g20-ek.
>
> First test was with the previous kernel config updated by oldconfig, so
> basically still using the PIT:
>
> +CONFIG_ATMEL_CLOCKSOURCE_PIT=y
>
> On the serial console with v4.16 and the patch set without switching to the
> new options, I see this on boot (no surprise, this is what it also prints with
> v4.9):
>
> clocksource: pit: mask: 0xfffffff max_cycles: 0xfffffff, max_idle_ns:
> 14468723050 ns
> …
> clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns:
> 19112604462750000 ns
> …
> clocksource: tcb_clksrc: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff,
> max_idle_ns: 115749784805 ns
> …
> clocksource: Switched to clocksource tcb_clksrc
>
> Interrupts here:
>
> $ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 16: 4802 atmel-aic 1 Level at91_tick, rtc0, ttyS0
> 19: 24041 atmel-aic 19 Level tc_clkevt
> 26: 124 atmel-aic 21 Level eth0
> 28: 1 GPIO 11 Edge reset
> Err: 0
>
> Second test with tcb block added to dts like in
> 32ce250b0af3b6971fc746445fce87861a9f5628 and with changed kernel config
> according to defconfig changes in patch 5 and 6:
>
> +# CONFIG_ATMEL_CLOCKSOURCE_PIT is not set
> +CONFIG_ATMEL_CLOCKSOURCE_TCB=y
> -CONFIG_ATMEL_TCLIB=y
> -CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC=y
> -CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC_BLOCK=0
> +# CONFIG_ATMEL_TCLIB is not set
> -CONFIG_ATMEL_PIT=y
> +CONFIG_ATMEL_ARM_TCB_CLKSRC=y
> -CONFIG_PWM_ATMEL_TCB=m
>
> The output on the serial console contains this:
>
> clocksource: timer@fffa0000:0,1: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff,
> max_idle_ns: 115749784805 ns
> …
> clocksource: jiffies: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns:
> 19112604462750000 ns
> …
> clocksource: Switched to clocksource timer@fffa0000:0,1
>
> Interrupts here:
>
> $ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 17: 5727291 atmel-aic 19 Level timer@fffa0000:2
> 18: 5523 atmel-aic 1 Level rtc0, ttyS0
> 26: 5031 atmel-aic 21 Level eth0
> 28: 1 GPIO 11 Edge reset
> Err: 0
>
> So, the board boots and runs like usual. I don't know if that qualifies for a
> Tested-by? Hope that helps.
Can you can give a rough amount for the irq rate on the timer ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 17:15 Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: at91: add TCB registers definitions Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] clocksource/drivers: Add a new driver for the Atmel ARM TC blocks Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] clocksource/drivers: atmel-pit: make option silent Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: at91: Implement clocksource selection Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: configs: at91: use new TCB timer driver Alexandre Belloni
2018-02-23 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: configs: at91: unselect PIT Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-22 15:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-27 10:41 ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-27 11:30 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2018-03-28 10:29 ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-28 13:03 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-28 14:16 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-28 14:36 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-28 15:31 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-28 15:50 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 8:01 ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-29 10:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 11:31 ` Alexander Dahl
2018-03-29 11:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 12:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-03-29 13:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-03-29 15:11 ` Alexander Dahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=989df8a3-462a-c645-87f1-9f956e1b22c9@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ada@thorsis.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®