mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@kernel.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	riel@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, marcos.souza.org@gmail.com,
	hoeun.ryu@gmail.com, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
	gs051095@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] memcg: Replace mm->owner with mm->memcg
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 10:47:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180502084708.GC26305@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8nr2sa3.fsf_-_@xmission.com>

[CC johannes and Tejun as well. I am sorry but my backlog is so huge I
will not get to this week.]

On Tue 01-05-18 12:35:16, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Recently it was reported that mm_update_next_owner could get into
> cases where it was executing it's fallback for_each_process part of
> the loop and thus taking up a lot of time.
> 
> To deal with this replace mm->owner with mm->memcg.  This just reduces
> the complexity of everything.  As much as possible I have maintained
> the current semantics.  There are two siginificant exceptions.  During
> fork the memcg of the process calling fork is charged rather than
> init_css_set.  During memory cgroup migration the charges are migrated
> not if the process is the owner of the mm, but if the process being
> migrated has the same memory cgroup as the mm.
> 
> I believe it was a bug if init_css_set is charged for memory activity
> during fork, and the old behavior was simply a consequence of the new
> task not having tsk->cgroup not initialized to it's proper cgroup.
> 
> Durhing cgroup migration only thread group leaders are allowed to
> migrate.  Which means in practice there should only be one.  Linux
> tasks created with CLONE_VM are the only exception, but the common
> cases are already ruled out.  Processes created with vfork have a
> suspended parent and can do nothing but call exec so they should never
> show up.  Threads of the same cgroup are not the thread group leader
> so also should not show up.  That leaves the old LinuxThreads library
> which is probably out of use by now, and someone doing something very
> creative with cgroups, and rolling their own threads with CLONE_VM.
> So in practice I don't think the difference charge migration will
> affect anyone.
> 
> To ensure that mm->memcg is updated appropriately I have implemented
> cgroup "attach" and "fork" methods.  This ensures that at those
> points the mm pointed to the task has the appropriate memory cgroup.
> 
> For simplicity instead of introducing a new mm lock I simply use
> exchange on the pointer where the mm->memcg is updated to get
> atomic updates.
> 
> Looking at the history effectively this change is a revert.  The
> reason given for adding mm->owner is so that multiple cgroups can be
> attached to the same mm.  In the last 8 years a second user of
> mm->owner has not appeared.  A feature that has never used, makes the
> code more complicated and has horrible worst case performance should
> go.
> 
> Fixes: cf475ad28ac3 ("cgroups: add an owner to the mm_struct")
> Reported-by:  Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
>  fs/exec.c                  |  1 -
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 11 ++++--
>  include/linux/mm_types.h   | 12 +------
>  include/linux/sched/mm.h   |  8 -----
>  kernel/exit.c              | 89 ----------------------------------------------
>  kernel/fork.c              | 17 +++++++--
>  mm/memcontrol.c            | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 183059c427b9..a8be9318d1a8 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1040,7 +1040,6 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  		up_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
>  		BUG_ON(active_mm != old_mm);
>  		setmax_mm_hiwater_rss(&tsk->signal->maxrss, old_mm);
> -		mm_update_next_owner(old_mm);
>  		mmput(old_mm);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index d99b71bc2c66..147e04bfcaee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -341,7 +341,6 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>  struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *, struct pglist_data *);
>  
>  bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> -struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p);
>  
>  static inline
>  struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css){
> @@ -402,6 +401,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_is_descendant(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	return cgroup_is_descendant(memcg->css.cgroup, root->css.cgroup);
>  }
>  
> +void mm_update_memcg(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mem_cgroup *new);
> +
>  static inline bool mm_match_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  				   struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> @@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ static inline bool mm_match_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	bool match = false;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
> +	task_memcg = rcu_dereference(mm->memcg);
>  	if (task_memcg)
>  		match = mem_cgroup_is_descendant(task_memcg, memcg);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -693,7 +694,7 @@ static inline void count_memcg_event_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		return;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
> +	memcg = rcu_dereference(mm->memcg);
>  	if (likely(memcg)) {
>  		count_memcg_events(memcg, idx, 1);
>  		if (idx == OOM_KILL)
> @@ -781,6 +782,10 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *page,
>  	return &pgdat->lruvec;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void mm_update_memcg(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mem_cgroup *new)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool mm_match_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 21612347d311..ea5efd40a5d1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -443,17 +443,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
>  	struct kioctx_table __rcu	*ioctx_table;
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> -	/*
> -	 * "owner" points to a task that is regarded as the canonical
> -	 * user/owner of this mm. All of the following must be true in
> -	 * order for it to be changed:
> -	 *
> -	 * current == mm->owner
> -	 * current->mm != mm
> -	 * new_owner->mm == mm
> -	 * new_owner->alloc_lock is held
> -	 */
> -	struct task_struct __rcu *owner;
> +	struct mem_cgroup __rcu	*memcg;
>  #endif
>  	struct user_namespace *user_ns;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index 2c570cd934af..cc8e68d36fc2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -95,14 +95,6 @@ extern struct mm_struct *mm_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode);
>  /* Remove the current tasks stale references to the old mm_struct */
>  extern void mm_release(struct task_struct *, struct mm_struct *);
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> -extern void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm);
> -#else
> -static inline void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  extern void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  				  struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index c3c7ac560114..be967d2da0ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -399,94 +399,6 @@ kill_orphaned_pgrp(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_struct *parent)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> -/*
> - * A task is exiting.   If it owned this mm, find a new owner for the mm.
> - */
> -void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -	struct task_struct *c, *g, *p = current;
> -
> -retry:
> -	/*
> -	 * If the exiting or execing task is not the owner, it's
> -	 * someone else's problem.
> -	 */
> -	if (mm->owner != p)
> -		return;
> -	/*
> -	 * The current owner is exiting/execing and there are no other
> -	 * candidates.  Do not leave the mm pointing to a possibly
> -	 * freed task structure.
> -	 */
> -	if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1) {
> -		mm->owner = NULL;
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -	/*
> -	 * Search in the children
> -	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(c, &p->children, sibling) {
> -		if (c->mm == mm)
> -			goto assign_new_owner;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Search in the siblings
> -	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(c, &p->real_parent->children, sibling) {
> -		if (c->mm == mm)
> -			goto assign_new_owner;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Search through everything else, we should not get here often.
> -	 */
> -	for_each_process(g) {
> -		if (g->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
> -			continue;
> -		for_each_thread(g, c) {
> -			if (c->mm == mm)
> -				goto assign_new_owner;
> -			if (c->mm)
> -				break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -	/*
> -	 * We found no owner yet mm_users > 1: this implies that we are
> -	 * most likely racing with swapoff (try_to_unuse()) or /proc or
> -	 * ptrace or page migration (get_task_mm()).  Mark owner as NULL.
> -	 */
> -	mm->owner = NULL;
> -	return;
> -
> -assign_new_owner:
> -	BUG_ON(c == p);
> -	get_task_struct(c);
> -	/*
> -	 * The task_lock protects c->mm from changing.
> -	 * We always want mm->owner->mm == mm
> -	 */
> -	task_lock(c);
> -	/*
> -	 * Delay read_unlock() till we have the task_lock()
> -	 * to ensure that c does not slip away underneath us
> -	 */
> -	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> -	if (c->mm != mm) {
> -		task_unlock(c);
> -		put_task_struct(c);
> -		goto retry;
> -	}
> -	mm->owner = c;
> -	task_unlock(c);
> -	put_task_struct(c);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
> -
>  /*
>   * Turn us into a lazy TLB process if we
>   * aren't already..
> @@ -540,7 +452,6 @@ static void exit_mm(void)
>  	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  	enter_lazy_tlb(mm, current);
>  	task_unlock(current);
> -	mm_update_next_owner(mm);
>  	mmput(mm);
>  	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
>  		exit_oom_victim();
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index a5d21c42acfc..f284acf22aad 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -868,10 +868,19 @@ static void mm_init_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -static void mm_init_owner(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p)
> +static void mm_init_memcg(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> -	mm->owner = p;
> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> +
> +	/* Ensure mm->memcg is initialized */
> +	mm->memcg = NULL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	css = task_css(current, memory_cgrp_id);
> +	if (css && css_tryget(css))
> +		mm_update_memcg(mm, mem_cgroup_from_css(css));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> @@ -901,7 +910,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
>  	spin_lock_init(&mm->page_table_lock);
>  	mm_init_cpumask(mm);
>  	mm_init_aio(mm);
> -	mm_init_owner(mm, p);
> +	mm_init_memcg(mm);
>  	RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->exe_file, NULL);
>  	mmu_notifier_mm_init(mm);
>  	hmm_mm_init(mm);
> @@ -931,6 +940,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
>  fail_nocontext:
>  	mm_free_pgd(mm);
>  fail_nopgd:
> +	mm_update_memcg(mm, NULL);
>  	free_mm(mm);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> @@ -968,6 +978,7 @@ static inline void __mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	}
>  	if (mm->binfmt)
>  		module_put(mm->binfmt->module);
> +	mm_update_memcg(mm, NULL);
>  	mmdrop(mm);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2bd3df3d101a..5dce8a7fa65b 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -664,20 +664,6 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * mm_update_next_owner() may clear mm->owner to NULL
> -	 * if it races with swapoff, page migration, etc.
> -	 * So this can be called with p == NULL.
> -	 */
> -	if (unlikely(!p))
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return mem_cgroup_from_css(task_css(p, memory_cgrp_id));
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_cgroup_from_task);
> -
>  static struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> @@ -692,7 +678,7 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  		if (unlikely(!mm))
>  			memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
>  		else {
> -			memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
> +			memcg = rcu_dereference(mm->memcg);
>  			if (unlikely(!memcg))
>  				memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
>  		}
> @@ -1011,7 +997,7 @@ bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  		 * killed to prevent needlessly killing additional tasks.
>  		 */
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -		task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(task);
> +		task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(task_css(task, memory_cgrp_id));
>  		css_get(&task_memcg->css);
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
> @@ -4827,15 +4813,16 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>  	if (!move_flags)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	from = mem_cgroup_from_task(p);
> +	from = mem_cgroup_from_css(task_css(p, memory_cgrp_id));
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON(from == memcg);
>  
>  	mm = get_task_mm(p);
>  	if (!mm)
>  		return 0;
> +
>  	/* We move charges only when we move a owner of the mm */
> -	if (mm->owner == p) {
> +	if (mm->memcg == from) {
>  		VM_BUG_ON(mc.from);
>  		VM_BUG_ON(mc.to);
>  		VM_BUG_ON(mc.precharge);
> @@ -4859,6 +4846,59 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * mm_update_memcg - Update the memory cgroup of a mm_struct
> + * @mm: mm struct
> + * @new: new memory cgroup value
> + *
> + * Called whenever mm->memcg needs to change.   Consumes a reference
> + * to new (unless new is NULL).   The reference to the old memory
> + * cgroup is decreased.
> + */
> +void mm_update_memcg(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mem_cgroup *new)
> +{
> +	/* This is the only place where mm->memcg is changed */
> +	struct mem_cgroup *old;
> +
> +	old = xchg(&mm->memcg, new);
> +	if (old)
> +		css_put(&old->css);
> +}
> +
> +static void task_update_memcg(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mem_cgroup *new)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> +	task_lock(tsk);
> +	mm = tsk->mm;
> +	if (mm && !(tsk->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> +		mm_update_memcg(mm, new);
> +	task_unlock(tsk);
> +}
> +
> +static void mem_cgroup_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> +	cgroup_taskset_for_each(tsk, css, tset) {
> +		struct mem_cgroup *new = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
> +		css_get(css);
> +		task_update_memcg(tsk, new);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void mem_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	css = task_css(tsk, memory_cgrp_id);
> +	if (css && css_tryget(css))
> +		task_update_memcg(tsk, mem_cgroup_from_css(css));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +
>  static void mem_cgroup_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>  {
>  	if (mc.to)
> @@ -5027,6 +5067,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static void mem_cgroup_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
> +{
> +}
> +static void mem_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +}
>  static void mem_cgroup_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>  {
>  }
> @@ -5335,8 +5381,10 @@ struct cgroup_subsys memory_cgrp_subsys = {
>  	.css_free = mem_cgroup_css_free,
>  	.css_reset = mem_cgroup_css_reset,
>  	.can_attach = mem_cgroup_can_attach,
> +	.attach = mem_cgroup_attach,
>  	.cancel_attach = mem_cgroup_cancel_attach,
>  	.post_attach = mem_cgroup_move_task,
> +	.fork = mem_cgroup_fork,
>  	.bind = mem_cgroup_bind,
>  	.dfl_cftypes = memory_files,
>  	.legacy_cftypes = mem_cgroup_legacy_files,
> @@ -5769,7 +5817,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk)
>  	}
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
> +	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(task_css(current, memory_cgrp_id));
>  	if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)
>  		goto out;
>  	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && !memcg->tcpmem_active)
> -- 
> 2.14.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-02  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-26 11:00 [PATCH 0/4] exit: Make unlikely case in mm_update_next_owner() more scalable Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] exit: Move read_unlock() up in mm_update_next_owner() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 15:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-26 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] exit: Use rcu instead of get_task_struct() " Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 11:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] exit: Rename assign_new_owner label " Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 11:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] exit: Lockless iteration over task list " Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 12:35   ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-26 13:52     ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 15:56         ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 16:04         ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 15:29       ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-26 16:11         ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 13:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] exit: Make unlikely case in mm_update_next_owner() more scalable Michal Hocko
2018-04-26 13:52   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-26 14:07   ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-26 15:10     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-26 16:19   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-04-26 19:28     ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-27  7:08       ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-27 18:05         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-01 17:22           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-01 17:35             ` [RFC][PATCH] memcg: Replace mm->owner with mm->memcg Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-02  8:47               ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-05-02 13:20                 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-05-02 14:05                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-02 19:21                   ` [PATCH] " Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-02 21:04                     ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-02 21:35                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03 13:33                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-03 14:39                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 14:20                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-04 14:36                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 14:54                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-04 15:49                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 16:22                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-04 16:40                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 17:26                                     ` [PATCH 0/2] mm->owner to mm->memcg fixes Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 17:26                                       ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: Update the mm->memcg maintenance to work when !CONFIG_MMU Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04 17:27                                       ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: Close the race between migration and installing bprm->mm as mm Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-09 14:51                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-10  3:00                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-10 12:14                                       ` [PATCH 0/2] mm->owner to mm->memcg fixes Michal Hocko
2018-05-10 12:18                                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-22 12:57                                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-23 19:46                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-24 11:10                                             ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-24 21:16                                               ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-24 23:37                                                 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-30 12:17                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-31 18:41                                                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01  1:57                                                     ` [PATCH] memcg: Replace mm->owner with mm->memcg Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 14:52                                                       ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] memcg: Require every task that uses an mm to migrate together Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 14:53                                                         ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] memcg: Ensure every task that uses an mm is in the same memory cgroup Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 16:50                                                           ` Tejun Heo
2018-06-01 18:11                                                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 19:16                                                               ` Tejun Heo
2018-06-04 13:01                                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-04 18:47                                                                   ` Tejun Heo
2018-06-04 19:11                                                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-06 11:13                                                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-07 11:42                                                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-07 12:19                                                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01 14:53                                                         ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] memcgl: Remove dead code now that all tasks of an mm share a memcg Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 14:07                                                     ` [PATCH 0/2] mm->owner to mm->memcg fixes Michal Hocko
2018-05-24 21:17                                               ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-30 11:52                                             ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-31 17:43                                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-07 14:33                                     ` [PATCH] memcg: Replace mm->owner with mm->memcg Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-08  3:15                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-09 14:40                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-10  3:09                                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-10  4:03                                             ` [RFC][PATCH] cgroup: Don't mess with tasks in exec Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-10 12:15                                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-10 12:35                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2018-05-10 12:38                                             ` [PATCH] memcg: Replace mm->owner with mm->memcg Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-04 11:07                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-05 16:54                     ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-07 23:18                       ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-08  2:17                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-09 21:00                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-02 23:59               ` [RFC][PATCH] " Balbir Singh
2018-05-03 15:11                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-04  4:59                   ` Balbir Singh
2018-05-03 10:52           ` [PATCH 0/4] exit: Make unlikely case in mm_update_next_owner() more scalable Kirill Tkhai
2018-06-01  1:07   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 13:57     ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01 14:32       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-01 15:02         ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01 15:25           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-04  6:54             ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-04 14:31               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-05  8:15                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-05  8:48             ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-06-05 15:36               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180502084708.GC26305@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gs051095@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hoeun.ryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcos.souza.org@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®