From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuyang.du@intel.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
patrick.bellasi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix util_avg of new tasks for asymmetric systems
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:58:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604115830.18781-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> (raw)
When a new task wakes-up for the first time, its initial utilization
is set to half of the spare capacity of its CPU. The current
implementation of post_init_entity_util_avg() uses SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
directly as a capacity reference. As a result, on a big.LITTLE system, a
new task waking up on an idle little CPU will be given ~512 of util_avg,
even if the CPU's capacity is significantly less than that.
Fix this by computing the spare capacity with arch_scale_cpu_capacity().
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e497c05aab7f..f19432c17017 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -735,11 +735,12 @@ static void attach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
* To solve this problem, we also cap the util_avg of successive tasks to
* only 1/2 of the left utilization budget:
*
- * util_avg_cap = (1024 - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
+ * util_avg_cap = (cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
*
- * where n denotes the nth task.
+ * where n denotes the nth task and cpu_scale the CPU capacity.
*
- * For example, a simplest series from the beginning would be like:
+ * For example, for a CPU with 1024 of capacity, a simplest series from
+ * the beginning would be like:
*
* task util_avg: 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, ...
* cfs_rq util_avg: 512, 768, 896, 960, 992, 1008, 1016, ...
@@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
- long cap = (long)(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
+ long cpu_scale = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)));
+ long cap = (long)(cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
if (cap > 0) {
if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
--
2.17.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 11:58 Quentin Perret [this message]
2018-06-04 12:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-04 14:34 ` Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180604115830.18781-1-quentin.perret@arm.com \
--to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®