* [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix util_avg of new tasks for asymmetric systems
@ 2018-06-04 11:58 Quentin Perret
2018-06-04 12:23 ` Vincent Guittot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Perret @ 2018-06-04 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz, mingo
Cc: linux-kernel, yuyang.du, dietmar.eggemann, morten.rasmussen,
patrick.bellasi, vincent.guittot, Quentin Perret
When a new task wakes-up for the first time, its initial utilization
is set to half of the spare capacity of its CPU. The current
implementation of post_init_entity_util_avg() uses SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
directly as a capacity reference. As a result, on a big.LITTLE system, a
new task waking up on an idle little CPU will be given ~512 of util_avg,
even if the CPU's capacity is significantly less than that.
Fix this by computing the spare capacity with arch_scale_cpu_capacity().
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e497c05aab7f..f19432c17017 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -735,11 +735,12 @@ static void attach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
* To solve this problem, we also cap the util_avg of successive tasks to
* only 1/2 of the left utilization budget:
*
- * util_avg_cap = (1024 - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
+ * util_avg_cap = (cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
*
- * where n denotes the nth task.
+ * where n denotes the nth task and cpu_scale the CPU capacity.
*
- * For example, a simplest series from the beginning would be like:
+ * For example, for a CPU with 1024 of capacity, a simplest series from
+ * the beginning would be like:
*
* task util_avg: 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, ...
* cfs_rq util_avg: 512, 768, 896, 960, 992, 1008, 1016, ...
@@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
- long cap = (long)(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
+ long cpu_scale = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)));
+ long cap = (long)(cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
if (cap > 0) {
if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
--
2.17.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix util_avg of new tasks for asymmetric systems
2018-06-04 11:58 [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix util_avg of new tasks for asymmetric systems Quentin Perret
@ 2018-06-04 12:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-04 14:34 ` Quentin Perret
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Guittot @ 2018-06-04 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Perret
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, Yuyang Du,
Dietmar Eggemann, Morten Rasmussen, Patrick Bellasi
On 4 June 2018 at 13:58, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> wrote:
> When a new task wakes-up for the first time, its initial utilization
> is set to half of the spare capacity of its CPU. The current
> implementation of post_init_entity_util_avg() uses SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
> directly as a capacity reference. As a result, on a big.LITTLE system, a
> new task waking up on an idle little CPU will be given ~512 of util_avg,
> even if the CPU's capacity is significantly less than that.
>
> Fix this by computing the spare capacity with arch_scale_cpu_capacity().
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e497c05aab7f..f19432c17017 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -735,11 +735,12 @@ static void attach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
> * To solve this problem, we also cap the util_avg of successive tasks to
> * only 1/2 of the left utilization budget:
> *
> - * util_avg_cap = (1024 - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
> + * util_avg_cap = (cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
> *
> - * where n denotes the nth task.
> + * where n denotes the nth task and cpu_scale the CPU capacity.
> *
> - * For example, a simplest series from the beginning would be like:
> + * For example, for a CPU with 1024 of capacity, a simplest series from
> + * the beginning would be like:
> *
> * task util_avg: 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, ...
> * cfs_rq util_avg: 512, 768, 896, 960, 992, 1008, 1016, ...
> @@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
> - long cap = (long)(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
> + long cpu_scale = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)));
> + long cap = (long)(cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
>
> if (cap > 0) {
> if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
> --
> 2.17.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix util_avg of new tasks for asymmetric systems
2018-06-04 12:23 ` Vincent Guittot
@ 2018-06-04 14:34 ` Quentin Perret
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Perret @ 2018-06-04 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Guittot
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, Yuyang Du,
Dietmar Eggemann, Morten Rasmussen, Patrick Bellasi
On Monday 04 Jun 2018 at 14:23:42 (+0200), Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 4 June 2018 at 13:58, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> wrote:
> > When a new task wakes-up for the first time, its initial utilization
> > is set to half of the spare capacity of its CPU. The current
> > implementation of post_init_entity_util_avg() uses SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
> > directly as a capacity reference. As a result, on a big.LITTLE system, a
> > new task waking up on an idle little CPU will be given ~512 of util_avg,
> > even if the CPU's capacity is significantly less than that.
> >
> > Fix this by computing the spare capacity with arch_scale_cpu_capacity().
> >
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Thanks !
>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index e497c05aab7f..f19432c17017 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -735,11 +735,12 @@ static void attach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
> > * To solve this problem, we also cap the util_avg of successive tasks to
> > * only 1/2 of the left utilization budget:
> > *
> > - * util_avg_cap = (1024 - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
> > + * util_avg_cap = (cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
> > *
> > - * where n denotes the nth task.
> > + * where n denotes the nth task and cpu_scale the CPU capacity.
> > *
> > - * For example, a simplest series from the beginning would be like:
> > + * For example, for a CPU with 1024 of capacity, a simplest series from
> > + * the beginning would be like:
> > *
> > * task util_avg: 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, ...
> > * cfs_rq util_avg: 512, 768, 896, 960, 992, 1008, 1016, ...
> > @@ -751,7 +752,8 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
> > {
> > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
> > - long cap = (long)(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
> > + long cpu_scale = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)));
> > + long cap = (long)(cpu_scale - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
> >
> > if (cap > 0) {
> > if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
> > --
> > 2.17.0
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-04 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-04 11:58 [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix util_avg of new tasks for asymmetric systems Quentin Perret
2018-06-04 12:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-06-04 14:34 ` Quentin Perret
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®