From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
efault@gmx.de, songliubraving@fb.com,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] x86,switch_mm: skip atomic operations for init_mm
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:31:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180626173126.12296-7-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626173126.12296-1-riel@surriel.com>
Song noticed switch_mm_irqs_off taking a lot of CPU time in recent
kernels,using 1.8% of a 48 CPU system during a netperf to localhost run.
Digging into the profile, we noticed that cpumask_clear_cpu and
cpumask_set_cpu together take about half of the CPU time taken by
switch_mm_irqs_off.
However, the CPUs running netperf end up switching back and forth
between netperf and the idle task, which does not require changes
to the mm_cpumask. Furthermore, the init_mm cpumask ends up being
the most heavily contended one in the system.`
Skipping cpumask_clear_cpu and cpumask_set_cpu for init_mm
(mostly the idle task) reduced CPU use of switch_mm_irqs_off
from 1.8% of the CPU to 0.9% of the CPU, with the following
netperf commandline:
./super_netperf 300 -P 0 -t TCP_RR -p 8888 -H <host> -l 30 \
-- -r 300,300 -o -s 1M,1M -S 1M,1M
w/o patchset:
Throughput: 1.71264e+06
perf profile:
0.95% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] switch_mm_irqs_off
0.77% netserver [kernel.vmlinux] [k] switch_mm_irqs_off
w/ patchset:
Throughput: 1.74075e+06
0.87% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] switch_mm_irqs_off
CPU use by enter_lazy_tlb is negligible. The bulk of the
savings from switch_mm_irqs_off seem to go towards higher
netperf throughput.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 96ab4eacda95..ab3992d82c40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -300,12 +300,15 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
}
/* Stop remote flushes for the previous mm */
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(real_prev)) &&
- real_prev != &init_mm);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(real_prev));
+ if (real_prev != &init_mm) {
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu,
+ mm_cpumask(real_prev)));
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(real_prev));
+ }
/* Start remote flushes. */
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
+ if (next != &init_mm)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
}
/* Read the tlb_gen to check whether a flush is needed. */
--
2.14.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-26 17:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-06-27 6:03 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-27 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-27 18:17 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-28 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 20:16 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH] x86,tlb: mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask() can be static kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180626173126.12296-7-riel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome