From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, tglx@linutronix.de, efault@gmx.de,
songliubraving@fb.com, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] x86,tlb: mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask() can be static
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 04:16:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180626201654.GA8061@lkp-ivb-ep02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626173126.12296-5-riel@surriel.com>
Fixes: 4d7614ce489c ("x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
tlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 03512772..e6d5b01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ void tlb_flush_remove_tables_local(void *arg)
}
}
-void mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask(struct mm_struct *mm, struct cpumask* lazy_cpus)
+static void mm_fill_lazy_tlb_cpu_mask(struct mm_struct *mm, struct cpumask* lazy_cpus)
{
int cpu;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-26 17:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-06-27 6:03 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-27 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-27 18:17 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-28 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 20:16 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-06-26 20:16 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-06-26 17:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86,switch_mm: skip atomic operations for init_mm Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180626201654.GA8061@lkp-ivb-ep02 \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®