From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
1vier1@web.de, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] ipc: Rename ipcctl_pre_down_nolock().
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 17:10:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180709151019.1336-5-manfred@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180709151019.1336-1-manfred@colorfullife.com>
Both the comment and the name of ipcctl_pre_down_nolock()
are misleading: The function must be called while holdling
the rw semaphore.
Therefore the patch renames the function to ipcctl_obtain_check():
This name matches the other names used in util.c:
- "obtain" function look up a pointer in the idr, without
acquiring the object lock.
- The caller is responsible for locking.
- _check means that the sequence number is checked.
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
ipc/msg.c | 2 +-
ipc/sem.c | 2 +-
ipc/shm.c | 2 +-
ipc/util.c | 8 ++++----
ipc/util.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/msg.c b/ipc/msg.c
index 5bf5cb8017ea..ba85d8849e8d 100644
--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int msgctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int msqid, int cmd,
down_write(&msg_ids(ns).rwsem);
rcu_read_lock();
- ipcp = ipcctl_pre_down_nolock(ns, &msg_ids(ns), msqid, cmd,
+ ipcp = ipcctl_obtain_check(ns, &msg_ids(ns), msqid, cmd,
&msqid64->msg_perm, msqid64->msg_qbytes);
if (IS_ERR(ipcp)) {
err = PTR_ERR(ipcp);
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 9d49efeac2e5..9742e9a1c0c2 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static int semctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid,
down_write(&sem_ids(ns).rwsem);
rcu_read_lock();
- ipcp = ipcctl_pre_down_nolock(ns, &sem_ids(ns), semid, cmd,
+ ipcp = ipcctl_obtain_check(ns, &sem_ids(ns), semid, cmd,
&semid64->sem_perm, 0);
if (IS_ERR(ipcp)) {
err = PTR_ERR(ipcp);
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index 06b7bf11a011..426ba1039a7b 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static int shmctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int shmid, int cmd,
down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rwsem);
rcu_read_lock();
- ipcp = ipcctl_pre_down_nolock(ns, &shm_ids(ns), shmid, cmd,
+ ipcp = ipcctl_obtain_check(ns, &shm_ids(ns), shmid, cmd,
&shmid64->shm_perm, 0);
if (IS_ERR(ipcp)) {
err = PTR_ERR(ipcp);
diff --git a/ipc/util.c b/ipc/util.c
index 8b09496ed720..bbb1ce212a0d 100644
--- a/ipc/util.c
+++ b/ipc/util.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ int ipc_update_perm(struct ipc64_perm *in, struct kern_ipc_perm *out)
}
/**
- * ipcctl_pre_down_nolock - retrieve an ipc and check permissions for some IPC_XXX cmd
+ * ipcctl_obtain_check - retrieve an ipc object and check permissions
* @ns: ipc namespace
* @ids: the table of ids where to look for the ipc
* @id: the id of the ipc to retrieve
@@ -713,16 +713,16 @@ int ipc_update_perm(struct ipc64_perm *in, struct kern_ipc_perm *out)
*
* This function does some common audit and permissions check for some IPC_XXX
* cmd and is called from semctl_down, shmctl_down and msgctl_down.
- * It must be called without any lock held and:
*
- * - retrieves the ipc with the given id in the given table.
+ * It:
+ * - retrieves the ipc object with the given id in the given table.
* - performs some audit and permission check, depending on the given cmd
* - returns a pointer to the ipc object or otherwise, the corresponding
* error.
*
* Call holding the both the rwsem and the rcu read lock.
*/
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_pre_down_nolock(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
+struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_obtain_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
struct ipc_ids *ids, int id, int cmd,
struct ipc64_perm *perm, int extra_perm)
{
diff --git a/ipc/util.h b/ipc/util.h
index 0aba3230d007..fcf81425ae98 100644
--- a/ipc/util.h
+++ b/ipc/util.h
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_obtain_object_idr(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id);
void kernel_to_ipc64_perm(struct kern_ipc_perm *in, struct ipc64_perm *out);
void ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm(struct ipc64_perm *in, struct ipc_perm *out);
int ipc_update_perm(struct ipc64_perm *in, struct kern_ipc_perm *out);
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_pre_down_nolock(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
+struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_obtain_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
struct ipc_ids *ids, int id, int cmd,
struct ipc64_perm *perm, int extra_perm);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-09 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 15:10 [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 01/12] ipc: reorganize initialization of kern_ipc_perm.id Manfred Spraul
2018-07-10 22:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 02/12] ipc: reorganize initialization of kern_ipc_perm.seq Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 03/12] ipc/util.c: Use ipc_rcu_putref() for failues in ipc_addid() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2018-07-09 19:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] ipc: Rename ipcctl_pre_down_nolock() Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] ipc/util.c: correct comment in ipc_obtain_object_check Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 18:46 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 06/12] ipc: rename ipc_lock() to ipc_lock_idr() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-11 19:38 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 07/12] ipc_idr_alloc refactoring Manfred Spraul
2018-07-11 19:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-11 20:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 08/12] lib/rhashtable: simplify bucket_table_alloc() Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 09/12] lib/rhashtable: guarantee initial hashtable allocation Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 10/12] ipc: get rid of ids->tables_initialized hack Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 11/12] ipc: simplify ipc initialization Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-09 23:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-09 15:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] ipc/util.c: Further ipc_idr_alloc cleanups Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 17:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-09 18:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2018-07-09 18:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-09 20:09 ` [PATCH 0/12 V2] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes, rhashtable update Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-10 4:44 ` Manfred Spraul
2018-07-10 22:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-07-12 18:52 [PATCH 0/12 V3] " Manfred Spraul
2018-07-12 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] ipc: Rename ipcctl_pre_down_nolock() Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180709151019.1336-5-manfred@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=1vier1@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®