From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, andres@anarazel.de, cmaiolino@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] vfs: track per-sb writeback errors and report them via fsinfo()
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:01:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180710140127.20739-1-jlayton@kernel.org> (raw)
v2: drop buffer.c patch to record wb errors when underlying blockdev
flush fails. We may eventually want that, but at this point I don't have
a clear way to test it to determine its efficacy.
At LSF/MM this year, the PostgreSQL developers mentioned that they'd
like to have some mechanism to check whether there have been any
writeback errors on a filesystem, without necessarily flushing any of
the cached data first.
Given that we have a new fsinfo syscall being introduced, we may as well
use it to report writeback errors on a per superblock basis. This allows
us to provide the info that the PostgreSQL developers wanted, without
needing to change an existing interface.
This seems to do the right thing when tested by hand, but I don't yet
have an xfstest for it, since the syscall is still quite new. Once that
goes in and we get fsinfo support in xfs_io, it should be rather
trivial to roll a testcase for this.
Al, if this looks ok, could you pull this into the branch where you
have David's fsinfo patches queued up?
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Layton (4):
vfs: track per-sb writeback errors
errseq: add a new errseq_scrape function
vfs: allow fsinfo to fetch the current state of s_wb_err
samples: extend test-fsinfo to access error_state
fs/statfs.c | 9 +++++++++
include/linux/errseq.h | 1 +
include/linux/fs.h | 3 +++
include/linux/pagemap.h | 5 ++++-
include/uapi/linux/fsinfo.h | 11 +++++++++++
lib/errseq.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
samples/statx/test-fsinfo.c | 13 +++++++++++++
7 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-10 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-10 14:01 Jeff Layton [this message]
2018-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] vfs: track per-sb writeback errors Jeff Layton
2018-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] errseq: add a new errseq_scrape function Jeff Layton
2018-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] vfs: allow fsinfo to fetch the current state of s_wb_err Jeff Layton
2018-07-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] samples: extend test-fsinfo to access error_state Jeff Layton
2018-07-10 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] vfs: track per-sb writeback errors and report them via fsinfo() David Howells
2018-07-13 6:43 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180710140127.20739-1-jlayton@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome