From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcu: Convert rcu_state.ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:07:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829230735.10256-10-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829230715.GA9431@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
1e64b15a4b10 ("rcu: Fix grace-period hangs due to race with CPU offline")
added spinlock_t ofl_lock to the rcu_state structure, then takes it with
preemption disabled during CPU offline, which gives the -rt patchset's
sleeping spinlock heartburn.
This commit therefore converts ->ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 12 ++++++------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 65b6e03ae6f5..0ce4702ce09f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
.abbr = RCU_ABBR,
.exp_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.exp_mutex),
.exp_wake_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.exp_wake_mutex),
- .ofl_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(rcu_state.ofl_lock),
+ .ofl_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(rcu_state.ofl_lock),
};
/* Dump rcu_node combining tree at boot to verify correct setup. */
@@ -1775,13 +1775,13 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
*/
rcu_state.gp_state = RCU_GP_ONOFF;
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
- spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
if (rnp->qsmaskinit == rnp->qsmaskinitnext &&
!rnp->wait_blkd_tasks) {
/* Nothing to do on this leaf rcu_node structure. */
raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
- spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
continue;
}
@@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
- spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
}
rcu_gp_slow(gp_preinit_delay); /* Races with CPU hotplug. */
@@ -3376,7 +3376,7 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
/* Remove outgoing CPU from mask in the leaf rcu_node structure. */
mask = rdp->grpmask;
- spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); /* Enforce GP memory-order guarantee. */
rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_seq = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq);
rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_flags = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags);
@@ -3387,7 +3387,7 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
}
rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~mask;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
- spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index bfbf97a1c29d..703e19ff532d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
const char *name; /* Name of structure. */
char abbr; /* Abbreviated name. */
- spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
+ raw_spinlock_t ofl_lock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
/* Synchronize offline with */
/* GP pre-initialization. */
};
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 23:07 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Dyntick changes for v4.20/v5.0 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcu: Remove unused rcu_dynticks_snap() from Tiny RCU Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] rcu: Merge rcu_dynticks structure into rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcu: Switch ->tick_nohz_enabled_snap to " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Switch last accelerate/advance " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcu: Switch lazy counts " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu: Switch urgent quiescent-state requests " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcu: Switch dyntick nesting counters " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcu: Switch ->dynticks to rcu_data structure, remove rcu_dynticks Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcu: Remove obsolete ->dynticks_fqs and ->cond_resched_completed Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829230735.10256-10-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®