From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcu: Switch lazy counts to rcu_data structure
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:07:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829230735.10256-5-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829230715.GA9431@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit removes ->all_lazy, ->nonlazy_posted and ->nonlazy_posted_snap
from the rcu_dynticks structure and updates the code to access them from
the rcu_data structure.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 7 -------
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 23 ++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 69bd6bec05bb..36a47c7bd882 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -43,13 +43,6 @@ struct rcu_dynticks {
atomic_t dynticks; /* Even value for idle, else odd. */
bool rcu_need_heavy_qs; /* GP old, need heavy quiescent state. */
bool rcu_urgent_qs; /* GP old need light quiescent state. */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
- bool all_lazy; /* Are all CPU's CBs lazy? */
- unsigned long nonlazy_posted;
- /* # times non-lazy CBs posted to CPU. */
- unsigned long nonlazy_posted_snap;
- /* idle-period nonlazy_posted snapshot. */
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ */
};
/* Communicate arguments to a workqueue handler. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 45708164ddf9..b5aeb2fe4cfe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1634,16 +1634,15 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(void)
int rcu_needs_cpu(u64 basemono, u64 *nextevt)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
- struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
unsigned long dj;
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
/* Snapshot to detect later posting of non-lazy callback. */
- rdtp->nonlazy_posted_snap = rdtp->nonlazy_posted;
+ rdp->nonlazy_posted_snap = rdp->nonlazy_posted;
/* If no callbacks, RCU doesn't need the CPU. */
- if (!rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(&rdtp->all_lazy)) {
+ if (!rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(&rdp->all_lazy)) {
*nextevt = KTIME_MAX;
return 0;
}
@@ -1657,7 +1656,7 @@ int rcu_needs_cpu(u64 basemono, u64 *nextevt)
rdp->last_accelerate = jiffies;
/* Request timer delay depending on laziness, and round. */
- if (!rdtp->all_lazy) {
+ if (!rdp->all_lazy) {
dj = round_up(rcu_idle_gp_delay + jiffies,
rcu_idle_gp_delay) - jiffies;
} else {
@@ -1681,7 +1680,6 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(void)
{
bool needwake;
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
- struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
struct rcu_node *rnp;
int tne;
@@ -1705,10 +1703,10 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(void)
* callbacks, invoke RCU core for the side-effect of recalculating
* idle duration on re-entry to idle.
*/
- if (rdtp->all_lazy &&
- rdtp->nonlazy_posted != rdtp->nonlazy_posted_snap) {
- rdtp->all_lazy = false;
- rdtp->nonlazy_posted_snap = rdtp->nonlazy_posted;
+ if (rdp->all_lazy &&
+ rdp->nonlazy_posted != rdp->nonlazy_posted_snap) {
+ rdp->all_lazy = false;
+ rdp->nonlazy_posted_snap = rdp->nonlazy_posted;
invoke_rcu_core();
return;
}
@@ -1754,7 +1752,7 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_after_idle(void)
*/
static void rcu_idle_count_callbacks_posted(void)
{
- __this_cpu_add(rcu_dynticks.nonlazy_posted, 1);
+ __this_cpu_add(rcu_data.nonlazy_posted, 1);
}
#endif /* #else #if !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ) */
@@ -1764,13 +1762,12 @@ static void rcu_idle_count_callbacks_posted(void)
static void print_cpu_stall_fast_no_hz(char *cp, int cpu)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
- struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
- unsigned long nlpd = rdtp->nonlazy_posted - rdtp->nonlazy_posted_snap;
+ unsigned long nlpd = rdp->nonlazy_posted - rdp->nonlazy_posted_snap;
sprintf(cp, "last_accelerate: %04lx/%04lx, nonlazy_posted: %ld, %c%c",
rdp->last_accelerate & 0xffff, jiffies & 0xffff,
ulong2long(nlpd),
- rdtp->all_lazy ? 'L' : '.',
+ rdp->all_lazy ? 'L' : '.',
rdp->tick_nohz_enabled_snap ? '.' : 'D');
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 23:07 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Dyntick changes for v4.20/v5.0 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcu: Remove unused rcu_dynticks_snap() from Tiny RCU Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] rcu: Merge rcu_dynticks structure into rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcu: Switch ->tick_nohz_enabled_snap to " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Switch last accelerate/advance " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu: Switch urgent quiescent-state requests " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcu: Switch dyntick nesting counters " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcu: Switch ->dynticks to rcu_data structure, remove rcu_dynticks Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcu: Remove obsolete ->dynticks_fqs and ->cond_resched_completed Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcu: Convert rcu_state.ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829230735.10256-5-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®