From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk/tracing: Do not trace printk_nmi_enter()
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:22:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906112233.068d45a7@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906023151.GA749@jagdpanzerIV>
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:31:51 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (09/05/18 21:33), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > do_idle {
> >
> > [interrupts enabled]
> >
> > <interrupt> [interrupts disabled]
> > TRACE_IRQS_OFF [lockdep says irqs off]
> > [...]
> > TRACE_IRQS_IRET
> > test if pt_regs say return to interrupts enabled [yes]
> > TRACE_IRQS_ON [lockdep says irqs are on]
> >
> > <nmi>
> > nmi_enter() {
> > printk_nmi_enter() [traced by ftrace]
> > [ hit ftrace breakpoint ]
> > <breakpoint exception>
> > TRACE_IRQS_OFF [lockdep says irqs off]
> > [...]
> > TRACE_IRQS_IRET [return from breakpoint]
> > test if pt_regs say interrupts enabled [no]
> > [iret back to interrupt]
> > [iret back to code]
> >
> > tick_nohz_idle_enter() {
> >
> > lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled() [lockdep say no!]
> >
> > Although interrupts are indeed enabled, lockdep thinks it is not, and since
> > we now do asserts via lockdep, it gives a false warning. The issue here is
> > that printk_nmi_enter() is called before lockdep_off(), which disables
> > lockdep (for this reason) in NMIs. By simply not allowing ftrace to see
> > printk_nmi_enter() (via notrace annotation) we keep lockdep from getting
> > confused.
>
> Great catch and I like the patch!
>
> Indeed, with printk_nmi we changed the "everything that nmi_enter does
> should happen after lockdep_off" to "everything that nmi_enter does should
> happen after printk_nmi_enter" // +similar change to nmi_exit.
>
> An alternative option, thus, could be re-instating back the rule that
> lockdep_off/on should be the first and the last thing we do in
> nmi_enter/nmi_exit. E.g.
>
> nmi_enter()
> lockdep_off();
> printk_nmi_enter();
>
> nmi_exit()
> printk_nmi_exit();
> lockdep_on();
>
> I guess that we can keep printk_nmi_enter/printk_nmi_exit at the top
> and at the bottom of nmi_enter/nmi_exit correspondingly just in case
> if lockdep_off/lockdep_on sometime in the future starts invoking printk(),
> which would deadlock us. Hence
I thought about doing the move first, but figured it wasn't needed, as
Petr said, it's before ftrace_nmi_enter() and should be notrace
regrardless.
>
> Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
>
>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 099f1c84c0052 ("printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq buffer")
>
> A minor nitpick,
>
> printk_nmi was introduced by 42a0bb3f71383b457 ("printk/nmi: generic
> solution for safe printk in NMI") - in that commit we declared a new
> printk_nmi_enter/exit should be the first and the last thing we do in
> nmi_enter/nmi_exit rule.
Thanks I'll update the change log. Grumble, my git blame foo is getting
rusty.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 1:33 Steven Rostedt
2018-09-06 2:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-06 9:04 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-06 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-09-07 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-07 8:28 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-07 8:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-07 13:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-07 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-07 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-10 5:32 ` locking/lockdep: Fix NMI handling kbuild test robot
2018-09-07 7:34 ` [PATCH] printk/tracing: Do not trace printk_nmi_enter() Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-07 13:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-07 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-07 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-07 14:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-07 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-07 14:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-07 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180906112233.068d45a7@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®