[PATCH] ARM: dts: fix imx7d boot spi dma setup error

[PATCH] ARM: dts: fix imx7d boot spi dma setup error

[Clark Wang]

Add dmas and dma-names for ecspi1~4 to fix kernel boot error:
"spi_imx 30840000.ecspi: dma setup error -19, use pio".

Signed-off-by: Xiaoning Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi
index aa8df7d93b2e..043e39124c43 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi
@@ -651,6 +651,8 @@
 				clocks = <&clks IMX7D_ECSPI4_ROOT_CLK>,
 					<&clks IMX7D_ECSPI4_ROOT_CLK>;
 				clock-names = "ipg", "per";
+				dmas = <&sdma 6 7 1>, <&sdma 7 7 2>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
 				status = "disabled";
 			};
 
@@ -732,6 +734,8 @@
 					clocks = <&clks IMX7D_ECSPI1_ROOT_CLK>,
 						<&clks IMX7D_ECSPI1_ROOT_CLK>;
 					clock-names = "ipg", "per";
+					dmas = <&sdma 0 7 1>, <&sdma 1 7 2>;
+					dma-names = "rx", "tx";
 					status = "disabled";
 				};
 
@@ -744,6 +748,8 @@
 					clocks = <&clks IMX7D_ECSPI2_ROOT_CLK>,
 						<&clks IMX7D_ECSPI2_ROOT_CLK>;
 					clock-names = "ipg", "per";
+					dmas = <&sdma 2 7 1>, <&sdma 3 7 2>;
+					dma-names = "rx", "tx";
 					status = "disabled";
 				};
 
@@ -756,6 +762,8 @@
 					clocks = <&clks IMX7D_ECSPI3_ROOT_CLK>,
 						<&clks IMX7D_ECSPI3_ROOT_CLK>;
 					clock-names = "ipg", "per";
+					dmas = <&sdma 4 7 1>, <&sdma 5 7 2>;
+					dma-names = "rx", "tx";
 					status = "disabled";
 				};
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: fix imx7d boot spi dma setup error

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:36:17AM +0000, Clark Wang wrote:
> Add dmas and dma-names for ecspi1~4 to fix kernel boot error:
> "spi_imx 30840000.ecspi: dma setup error -19, use pio".

Actually this should not be an error and the message is supposed to say:

	Unable to setup DMA, falling back to PIO

So IMHO this should be downgraded from dev_err to dev_info and reworded.
Maybe even try DMA-setup on devices where it is known to fail and don't
emit a message on -ENODEV at all.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |