mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:26:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181126212628.4apztfazichxnt7r@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126200801.GW2113@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:08:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:56:24AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
> > index d3869295b88d..8fd6c8556750 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
> > @@ -7,24 +7,19 @@
> >  
> >  #define CALL_INSN_SIZE 5
> >  
> > +unsigned long bp_handler_call_return_addr;
> >  
> > +static void static_call_bp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Push the return address on the stack so the "called" function will
> > +	 * return to immediately after the call site.
> > +	 */
> > +	regs->sp -= sizeof(long);
> > +	*(unsigned long *)regs->sp = bp_handler_call_return_addr;
> >  #endif
> > +}
> >  
> >  void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func)
> >  {
> > @@ -52,14 +47,12 @@ void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func)
> >  	opcodes[0] = insn_opcode;
> >  	memcpy(&opcodes[1], &dest_relative, CALL_INSN_SIZE - 1);
> >  
> >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE))
> > +		bp_handler_call_return_addr = insn + CALL_INSN_SIZE;
> >  
> >  	/* Patch the call site: */
> >  	text_poke_bp((void *)insn, opcodes, CALL_INSN_SIZE,
> > -		     static_call_bp_handler);
> > +		     static_call_bp_handler, func);
> >  
> >  done:
> >  	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> 
> 
> like maybe something along the lines of:
> 
> struct sc_data {
> 	unsigned long ret;
> 	unsigned long ip;
> };
> 
> void sc_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
> {
> 	struct sc_data *scd = data;
> 
> 	regs->sp -= sizeof(long);
> 	*(unsigned long *)regs->sp = scd->ret;
> 	regs->ip = scd->ip;
> }
> 
> arch_static_call_transform()
> {
> 	...
> 
> 	scd = (struct sc_data){
> 		.ret = insn + CALL_INSN_SIZE,
> 		.ip = (unsigned long)func,
> 	};
> 
> 	text_poke_bp((void *)insn, opcodes, CALL_INSN_SIZE,
> 			sc_handler, (void *)&scd);
> 
> 	...
> }

Yeah, that's probably better.  I assume you also mean that we would have
all text_poke_bp() users create a handler callback?  That way the
interface is clear and consistent for everybody.  Like:

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
index e85ff65c43c3..04d6cf838fb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ static inline void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch_site *start,
 
 extern void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
 
+typedef void (*bp_handler_t)(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data);
+
 /*
  * Clear and restore the kernel write-protection flag on the local CPU.
  * Allows the kernel to edit read-only pages.
@@ -36,7 +38,8 @@ extern void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
  */
 extern void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
 extern int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler);
+extern void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len,
+			  bp_handler_t handler, void *data);
 extern int after_bootmem;
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_TEXT_PATCHING_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index ebeac487a20c..547af714bd60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -738,7 +738,8 @@ static void do_sync_core(void *info)
 }
 
 static bool bp_patching_in_progress;
-static void *bp_int3_handler, *bp_int3_addr;
+static void *bp_int3_data, *bp_int3_addr;
+static bp_handler_t bp_int3_handler;
 
 int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -746,11 +747,11 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * Having observed our INT3 instruction, we now must observe
 	 * bp_patching_in_progress.
 	 *
-	 * 	in_progress = TRUE		INT3
-	 * 	WMB				RMB
-	 * 	write INT3			if (in_progress)
+	 *	in_progress = TRUE		INT3
+	 *	WMB				RMB
+	 *	write INT3			if (in_progress)
 	 *
-	 * Idem for bp_int3_handler.
+	 * Idem for bp_int3_data.
 	 */
 	smp_rmb();
 
@@ -760,8 +761,7 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (user_mode(regs) || regs->ip != (unsigned long)bp_int3_addr)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* set up the specified breakpoint handler */
-	regs->ip = (unsigned long) bp_int3_handler;
+	bp_int3_handler(regs, bp_int3_data);
 
 	return 1;
 
@@ -772,7 +772,8 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
  * @addr:	address to patch
  * @opcode:	opcode of new instruction
  * @len:	length to copy
- * @handler:	address to jump to when the temporary breakpoint is hit
+ * @handler:	handler to call from int3 context
+ * @data:	opaque data passed to handler
  *
  * Modify multi-byte instruction by using int3 breakpoint on SMP.
  * We completely avoid stop_machine() here, and achieve the
@@ -787,11 +788,13 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
  *	  replacing opcode
  *	- sync cores
  */
-void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler)
+void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len,
+		   bp_handler_t handler, void *data)
 {
 	unsigned char int3 = 0xcc;
 
 	bp_int3_handler = handler;
+	bp_int3_data = data;
 	bp_int3_addr = (u8 *)addr + sizeof(int3);
 	bp_patching_in_progress = true;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
index aac0c1f7e354..d4b0abe4912d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ static void bug_at(unsigned char *ip, int line)
 	BUG();
 }
 
+static inline void jump_label_bp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
+{
+	regs->ip += JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE - 1;
+}
+
 static void __ref __jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
 					 enum jump_label_type type,
 					 void *(*poker)(void *, const void *, size_t),
@@ -91,7 +96,7 @@ static void __ref __jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
 	}
 
 	text_poke_bp((void *)jump_entry_code(entry), code, JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE,
-		     (void *)jump_entry_code(entry) + JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE);
+		     jump_label_bp_handler, NULL);
 }
 
 void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
index 40b16b270656..b2dffdd6068d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
@@ -424,6 +424,11 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
 	goto out;
 }
 
+static void kprobes_poke_bp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
+{
+	regs->ip = data;
+}
+
 /*
  * Replace breakpoints (int3) with relative jumps.
  * Caller must call with locking kprobe_mutex and text_mutex.
@@ -447,7 +452,7 @@ void arch_optimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist)
 		*(s32 *)(&insn_buf[1]) = rel;
 
 		text_poke_bp(op->kp.addr, insn_buf, RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE,
-			     op->optinsn.insn);
+			     kprobes_poke_bp_handler, op->optinsn.insn);
 
 		list_del_init(&op->list);
 	}
@@ -462,7 +467,7 @@ void arch_unoptimize_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
 	insn_buf[0] = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION;
 	memcpy(insn_buf + 1, op->optinsn.copied_insn, RELATIVE_ADDR_SIZE);
 	text_poke_bp(op->kp.addr, insn_buf, RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE,
-		     op->optinsn.insn);
+		     kprobes_poke_bp_handler, op->optinsn.insn);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
index d3869295b88d..e05ebc6d4db5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -7,24 +7,30 @@
 
 #define CALL_INSN_SIZE 5
 
-void static_call_bp_handler(void);
-void *bp_handler_dest;
-void *bp_handler_continue;
-
-asm(".pushsection .text, \"ax\"						\n"
-    ".globl static_call_bp_handler					\n"
-    ".type static_call_bp_handler, @function				\n"
-    "static_call_bp_handler:						\n"
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
-    ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
-    "call *bp_handler_dest						\n"
-    ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
-    "jmp *bp_handler_continue						\n"
-#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE */
-    ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
-    "jmp *bp_handler_dest						\n"
-#endif
-    ".popsection							\n");
+struct static_call_bp_data {
+	unsigned long func, ret;
+};
+
+static void static_call_bp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *_data)
+{
+	struct static_call_bp_data *data = _data;
+
+	/*
+	 * For inline static calls, push the return address on the stack so the
+	 * "called" function will return to the location immediately after the
+	 * call site.
+	 *
+	 * NOTE: This code will need to be revisited when kernel CET gets
+	 *       implemented.
+	 */
+	if (data->ret) {
+		regs->sp -= sizeof(long);
+		*(unsigned long *)regs->sp = data->ret;
+	}
+
+	/* The exception handler will 'return' to the destination function. */
+	regs->ip = data->func;
+}
 
 void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func)
 {
@@ -32,11 +38,17 @@ void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func)
 	unsigned long insn;
 	unsigned char insn_opcode;
 	unsigned char opcodes[CALL_INSN_SIZE];
+	struct static_call_bp_data handler_data;
+
+	handler_data.func = (unsigned long)func;
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE)) {
 		insn = (unsigned long)site;
-	else
+		handler_data.ret = insn + CALL_INSN_SIZE;
+	} else {
 		insn = (unsigned long)tramp;
+		handler_data.ret = 0;
+	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 
@@ -52,14 +64,9 @@ void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func)
 	opcodes[0] = insn_opcode;
 	memcpy(&opcodes[1], &dest_relative, CALL_INSN_SIZE - 1);
 
-	/* Set up the variables for the breakpoint handler: */
-	bp_handler_dest = func;
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE))
-		bp_handler_continue = (void *)(insn + CALL_INSN_SIZE);
-
 	/* Patch the call site: */
 	text_poke_bp((void *)insn, opcodes, CALL_INSN_SIZE,
-		     static_call_bp_handler);
+		     static_call_bp_handler, &handler_data);
 
 done:
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26 13:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] Static calls Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-27  8:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] static_call: Add static call infrastructure Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 13:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 15:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 16:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-26 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 16:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 17:10     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 17:56       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 20:00         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 20:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 21:26           ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-11-27  8:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-27  8:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29  6:05               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29  9:42                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 13:11                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 13:37                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 14:38                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 14:42                       ` Jiri Kosina
2018-11-29 16:33                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 16:49                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 16:59                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 17:10                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 22:01                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 22:14                                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 22:22                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 22:25                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 22:30                                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 17:15                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 17:20                               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 17:21                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 17:41                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 17:45                                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 17:52                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 17:49                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 18:37                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 16:50                         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 16:55                           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 17:02                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 17:07                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-29 17:31                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 17:35                                 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-11-29 17:13                             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 17:35                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 17:44                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 17:50                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 17:54                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 17:58                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 18:23                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 18:47                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 18:58                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 19:08                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 19:11                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-10 23:58                                                 ` Pavel Machek
2018-12-11  1:43                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 19:12                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 19:27                                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 20:24                                                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 22:17                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 23:04                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-30 16:27                                                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-12-11  9:41                                                       ` David Laight
2018-12-11 17:19                                                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-12-12 18:29                                                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-30 16:42                                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-30 18:39                                                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-30 19:45                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-30 20:18                                                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-30 20:28                                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-30 20:59                                                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-30 21:01                                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-30 21:13                                                               ` Jiri Kosina
2018-11-30 21:10                                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 19:16                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 19:22                                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 19:27                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-30 22:16                                                 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-11-30 22:24                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 19:24                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 19:28                                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 19:31                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 20:12                                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-29 18:00                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-29 18:42                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 18:55                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 17:29                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-29 17:35                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-26 18:28       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-26 20:14         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-27  8:46           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 16:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 16:11     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-26 16:33       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-26 16:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 16:44         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Static calls Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-26 22:24   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-26 22:53     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-04 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-04 23:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-05 15:04     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-12-05 23:36       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-07 16:06 ` Edward Cree
2018-12-07 16:49   ` Edward Cree
2018-12-11 18:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-12-12  5:59     ` Nadav Amit
2018-12-12 17:11       ` Edward Cree
2018-12-12 17:47         ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 0/2] dynamic calls Edward Cree
2018-12-12 17:50           ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] static_call: fix out-of-line static call implementation Edward Cree
2018-12-12 17:52           ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: core: rather hacky PoC implementation of dynamic calls Edward Cree
2018-12-12 18:14         ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Static calls Nadav Amit
2018-12-12 18:33           ` Edward Cree
2018-12-12 21:15             ` Nadav Amit
2018-12-12 21:36               ` Edward Cree
2018-12-12 21:45                 ` Nadav Amit
2018-12-10 23:57 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181126212628.4apztfazichxnt7r@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=julia@ni.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®