From: Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>, Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/platform/UV: use efi_runtime_sem to serialise BIOS calls
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:45:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109104541.25733-4-hedi.berriche@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109104541.25733-1-hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
Calls into UV firmware must be protected against concurrency, use the
now visible efi_runtime_sem lock to serialise them.
Signed-off-by: Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h
index 4eee646544b2..33e94aa0b1ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/bios.h
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ enum {
BIOS_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0,
BIOS_STATUS_UNIMPLEMENTED = -ENOSYS,
BIOS_STATUS_EINVAL = -EINVAL,
- BIOS_STATUS_UNAVAIL = -EBUSY
+ BIOS_STATUS_UNAVAIL = -EBUSY,
+ BIOS_STATUS_ABORT = -EINTR
};
/* Address map parameters */
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
index cd05af157763..92f960798e20 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
struct uv_systab *uv_systab;
-s64 uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3, u64 a4, u64 a5)
+s64 __uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3,
+ u64 a4, u64 a5)
{
struct uv_systab *tab = uv_systab;
s64 ret;
@@ -44,13 +45,26 @@ s64 uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3, u64 a4, u64 a5)
* If EFI_OLD_MEMMAP is set, we need to fall back to using our old EFI
* callback method, which uses efi_call() directly, with the kernel page tables:
*/
- if (unlikely(test_bit(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP, &efi.flags)))
+ if (unlikely(efi_enabled(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP)))
ret = efi_call((void *)__va(tab->function), (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
else
ret = efi_call_virt_pointer(tab, function, (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
return ret;
}
+
+s64 uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3, u64 a4, u64 a5)
+{
+ s64 ret;
+
+ if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
+ return BIOS_STATUS_ABORT;
+
+ ret = __uv_bios_call(which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
+ up(&efi_runtime_sem);
+
+ return ret;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_bios_call);
s64 uv_bios_call_irqsave(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3,
@@ -59,10 +73,15 @@ s64 uv_bios_call_irqsave(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3,
unsigned long bios_flags;
s64 ret;
+ if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
+ return BIOS_STATUS_ABORT;
+
local_irq_save(bios_flags);
- ret = uv_bios_call(which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
+ ret = __uv_bios_call(which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
local_irq_restore(bios_flags);
+ up(&efi_runtime_sem);
+
return ret;
}
--
2.20.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 10:45 [PATCH 0/3] Protect against concurrent calls into UV BIOS Hedi Berriche
2019-01-09 10:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] efi/x86: turn EFI runtime semaphore into a global lock Hedi Berriche
2019-01-15 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-01-15 19:35 ` Hedi Berriche
2019-01-26 14:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-09 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/platform/UV: kill uv_bios_call_reentrant() as it has no callers Hedi Berriche
2019-01-26 14:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-09 10:45 ` Hedi Berriche [this message]
2019-01-10 7:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/platform/UV: use efi_runtime_sem to serialise BIOS calls Bhupesh Sharma
2019-01-14 11:30 ` Hedi Berriche
2019-01-26 14:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109104541.25733-4-hedi.berriche@hpe.com \
--to=hedi.berriche@hpe.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rja@hpe.com \
--cc=sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®