From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: Inline _synchronize_rcu_expedited() into synchronize_rcu_expedited()
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:18:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109211850.31599-11-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109211830.GA30595@linux.ibm.com>
Now that _synchronize_rcu_expedited() has only one caller, and given that
this is a tail call, this commit inlines _synchronize_rcu_expedited()
into synchronize_rcu_expedited().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 353d113c0cd4..d882ca0cd01b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -599,50 +599,6 @@ static void wait_rcu_exp_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(rewp->rew_s);
}
-/*
- * Given a smp_call_function() handler, kick off the specified
- * implementation of expedited grace period.
- */
-static void _synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
-{
- struct rcu_data *rdp;
- struct rcu_exp_work rew;
- struct rcu_node *rnp;
- unsigned long s;
-
- /* If expedited grace periods are prohibited, fall back to normal. */
- if (rcu_gp_is_normal()) {
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Take a snapshot of the sequence number. */
- s = rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap();
- if (exp_funnel_lock(s))
- return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
-
- /* Ensure that load happens before action based on it. */
- if (unlikely(rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT)) {
- /* Direct call during scheduler init and early_initcalls(). */
- rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(s);
- } else {
- /* Marshall arguments & schedule the expedited grace period. */
- rew.rew_s = s;
- INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&rew.rew_work, wait_rcu_exp_gp);
- queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rew.rew_work);
- }
-
- /* Wait for expedited grace period to complete. */
- rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, raw_smp_processor_id());
- rnp = rcu_get_root();
- wait_event(rnp->exp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(s) & 0x3],
- sync_exp_work_done(s));
- smp_mb(); /* Workqueue actions happen before return. */
-
- /* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
- mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
/*
@@ -792,6 +748,11 @@ static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu)
*/
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ struct rcu_exp_work rew;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
+ unsigned long s;
+
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
@@ -801,6 +762,36 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
return;
- _synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+ /* If expedited grace periods are prohibited, fall back to normal. */
+ if (rcu_gp_is_normal()) {
+ wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Take a snapshot of the sequence number. */
+ s = rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap();
+ if (exp_funnel_lock(s))
+ return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
+
+ /* Ensure that load happens before action based on it. */
+ if (unlikely(rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT)) {
+ /* Direct call during scheduler init and early_initcalls(). */
+ rcu_exp_sel_wait_wake(s);
+ } else {
+ /* Marshall arguments & schedule the expedited grace period. */
+ rew.rew_s = s;
+ INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&rew.rew_work, wait_rcu_exp_gp);
+ queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rew.rew_work);
+ }
+
+ /* Wait for expedited grace period to complete. */
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, raw_smp_processor_id());
+ rnp = rcu_get_root();
+ wait_event(rnp->exp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(s) & 0x3],
+ sync_exp_work_done(s));
+ smp_mb(); /* Workqueue actions happen before return. */
+
+ /* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
+ mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 21:18 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/12] RCU flavor consolidation cleanups for v5.1 Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/12] sched: Replace call_rcu_sched() with call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/12] sched: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: Rename and comment changes due to only one rcuo kthread per CPU Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: Make expedited IPI handler return after handling critical section Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: Inline force_quiescent_state() into rcu_force_quiescent_state() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Eliminate RCU_BH_FLAVOR and RCU_SCHED_FLAVOR Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: Inline rcu_kthread_do_work() into its sole remaining caller Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Determine expedited-GP IPI handler at build time Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu: Consolidate PREEMPT and !PREEMPT synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Consolidate PREEMPT and !PREEMPT synchronize_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Discard separate per-CPU callback counts Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 23:37 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/12] Remove wrapper definitions for obsolete RCU update functions Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109211850.31599-11-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome