mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: Make expedited IPI handler return after handling critical section
Date: Wed,  9 Jan 2019 13:18:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109211850.31599-4-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109211830.GA30595@linux.ibm.com>

During expedited RCU grace-period initialization, IPIs are sent to
all non-idle online CPUs.  The IPI handler checks to see if the CPU is
in quiescent state, reporting one if so.  This handler looks at three
different cases: (1) The CPU is not in an rcu_read_lock()-based critical
section, (2) The CPU is in the process of exiting an rcu_read_lock()-based
critical section, and (3) The CPU is in an rcu_read_lock()-based critical
section.  In case (2), execution falls through into case (3).

This is harmless from a functionality viewpoint, but can result in
needless overhead during an improbable corner case.  This commit therefore
adds the "return" statement needed to prevent fall-through.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 928fe5893a57..6d4eb4694b6f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
 			WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint, true);
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-09 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-09 21:18 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/12] RCU flavor consolidation cleanups for v5.1 Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/12] sched: Replace call_rcu_sched() with call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/12] sched: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: Rename and comment changes due to only one rcuo kthread per CPU Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: Inline force_quiescent_state() into rcu_force_quiescent_state() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Eliminate RCU_BH_FLAVOR and RCU_SCHED_FLAVOR Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: Inline rcu_kthread_do_work() into its sole remaining caller Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Determine expedited-GP IPI handler at build time Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu: Consolidate PREEMPT and !PREEMPT synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Consolidate PREEMPT and !PREEMPT synchronize_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: Inline _synchronize_rcu_expedited() into synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 21:18 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Discard separate per-CPU callback counts Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 23:37 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/12] Remove wrapper definitions for obsolete RCU update functions Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190109211850.31599-4-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome