mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Marian Mihailescu <mihailescu2m@gmail.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pm: fix HYP/SVC mode mismatch when MCPM is used
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:58:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214165807.eq34njmunqhrdvxx@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214143114.24356-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 03:31:14PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> MCPM does a soft reset of the CPUs and uses common cpu_resume() routine to
> perform low-level platform initialization. This results in a try to install
> HYP stubs for the second time for each CPU and results in false HYP/SVC
> mode mismatch detection. The HYP stubs are already installed at the
> beginning of the kernel initialization on the boot CPU (head.S) or in the
> secondary_startup() for other CPUs. To fix this issue MCPM code should use
> a cpu_resume() routine without HYP stubs installation.
> 
> This change fixes HYP/SVC mode mismatch on Samsung Exynos5422-based Odroid
> XU3/XU4/HC1 boards.
> 
> Fixes: 3721924c8154 ("ARM: 8081/1: MCPM: provide infrastructure to allow for MCPM loopback")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S        | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> index ad574d20415c..1b1b82b37ce0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int __init nocache_trampoline(unsigned long _arg)
>  	unsigned int cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
>  	phys_reset_t phys_reset;
>  
> -	mcpm_set_entry_vector(cpu, cluster, cpu_resume);
> +	mcpm_set_entry_vector(cpu, cluster, cpu_resume_no_hyp);
>  	setup_mm_for_reboot();
>  
>  	__mcpm_cpu_going_down(cpu, cluster);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h
> index 452bbdcbcc83..506314265c6f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct sleep_save_sp {
>  };
>  
>  extern void cpu_resume(void);
> +extern void cpu_resume_no_hyp(void);
>  extern void cpu_resume_arm(void);
>  extern int cpu_suspend(unsigned long, int (*)(unsigned long));
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> index a8257fc9cf2a..b856d183691e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> @@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_resume_after_mmu)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  	.arm
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
> +ENTRY(cpu_resume_no_hyp)
> +ARM_BE8(setend be)			@ ensure we are in BE mode
> +	b	0f

What if the kernel is built for Thumb?  You'll be branching to thumb
code at the '0' label - don't you need to do the same that
cpu_resume_arm does below?

> +#endif
>  ENTRY(cpu_resume_arm)
>   THUMB(	badr	r9, 1f		)	@ Kernel is entered in ARM.
>   THUMB(	bx	r9		)	@ If this is a Thumb-2 kernel,
> @@ -135,6 +140,9 @@ ARM_BE8(setend be)			@ ensure we are in BE mode
>  	bl	__hyp_stub_install_secondary
>  #endif
>  	safe_svcmode_maskall r1
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
> +0:
> +#endif

You don't need to conditionalise this.  I'd also use a symbol rather
than a numeric label given that safe_svcmode_maskall is a macro that
also uses numeric labels.

>  	mov	r1, #0
>  	ALT_SMP(mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 5)
>  	ALT_UP_B(1f)
> @@ -163,6 +171,9 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_resume)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  ENDPROC(cpu_resume_arm)
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
> +ENDPROC(cpu_resume_no_hyp)
>  #endif
>  
>  	.align 2
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20190214143126eucas1p126506139ef72c1685654c8dac8957b3d@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-02-14 14:31 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-02-14 16:05   ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-02-14 16:58   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-02-15 10:23     ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-02-15 10:33       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214165807.eq34njmunqhrdvxx@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mihailescu2m@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome