From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marian Mihailescu <mihailescu2m@gmail.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pm: fix HYP/SVC mode mismatch when MCPM is used
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:58:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214165807.eq34njmunqhrdvxx@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214143114.24356-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 03:31:14PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> MCPM does a soft reset of the CPUs and uses common cpu_resume() routine to
> perform low-level platform initialization. This results in a try to install
> HYP stubs for the second time for each CPU and results in false HYP/SVC
> mode mismatch detection. The HYP stubs are already installed at the
> beginning of the kernel initialization on the boot CPU (head.S) or in the
> secondary_startup() for other CPUs. To fix this issue MCPM code should use
> a cpu_resume() routine without HYP stubs installation.
>
> This change fixes HYP/SVC mode mismatch on Samsung Exynos5422-based Odroid
> XU3/XU4/HC1 boards.
>
> Fixes: 3721924c8154 ("ARM: 8081/1: MCPM: provide infrastructure to allow for MCPM loopback")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> index ad574d20415c..1b1b82b37ce0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int __init nocache_trampoline(unsigned long _arg)
> unsigned int cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
> phys_reset_t phys_reset;
>
> - mcpm_set_entry_vector(cpu, cluster, cpu_resume);
> + mcpm_set_entry_vector(cpu, cluster, cpu_resume_no_hyp);
> setup_mm_for_reboot();
>
> __mcpm_cpu_going_down(cpu, cluster);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h
> index 452bbdcbcc83..506314265c6f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/suspend.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct sleep_save_sp {
> };
>
> extern void cpu_resume(void);
> +extern void cpu_resume_no_hyp(void);
> extern void cpu_resume_arm(void);
> extern int cpu_suspend(unsigned long, int (*)(unsigned long));
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> index a8257fc9cf2a..b856d183691e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S
> @@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_resume_after_mmu)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> .arm
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
> +ENTRY(cpu_resume_no_hyp)
> +ARM_BE8(setend be) @ ensure we are in BE mode
> + b 0f
What if the kernel is built for Thumb? You'll be branching to thumb
code at the '0' label - don't you need to do the same that
cpu_resume_arm does below?
> +#endif
> ENTRY(cpu_resume_arm)
> THUMB( badr r9, 1f ) @ Kernel is entered in ARM.
> THUMB( bx r9 ) @ If this is a Thumb-2 kernel,
> @@ -135,6 +140,9 @@ ARM_BE8(setend be) @ ensure we are in BE mode
> bl __hyp_stub_install_secondary
> #endif
> safe_svcmode_maskall r1
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
> +0:
> +#endif
You don't need to conditionalise this. I'd also use a symbol rather
than a numeric label given that safe_svcmode_maskall is a macro that
also uses numeric labels.
> mov r1, #0
> ALT_SMP(mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 5)
> ALT_UP_B(1f)
> @@ -163,6 +171,9 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_resume)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> ENDPROC(cpu_resume_arm)
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
> +ENDPROC(cpu_resume_no_hyp)
> #endif
>
> .align 2
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190214143126eucas1p126506139ef72c1685654c8dac8957b3d@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-02-14 14:31 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-02-14 16:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-02-14 16:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-02-15 10:23 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-02-15 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190214165807.eq34njmunqhrdvxx@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mihailescu2m@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome