From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Manoj Gupta <manojgupta@chromium.org>,
Tiancong Wang <tcwang@chromium.org>,
Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/vdso: include generic __lshrdi3 in 32-bit vDSO
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:29:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190315222906.GC112750@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=aqWvjzC1ZF5_pXx2VutAX0dneDPxU_=jroqHUGw-X6g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Nick,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:31:09PM -0700, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:54 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Building the 32-bit vDSO with a recent clang version fails due
> > to undefined symbols:
> >
> > arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: undefined symbols found
> >
> > The undefined symbol in this case is __lshrdi3, which is part of
> > the compiler runtime library, however the vDSO isn't linked against
> > this library.
> >
> > Include the kernel version of __lshrdi3 in the 32-bit vDSO build.
>
> __lshrdi3 is used for "logical shift right double-word by int" (best
> guess), so anywhere there's a right shift of a u64. Looks like
> there's a few of these in arch/x86/entry/vdso/, so it's legal for the
> compiler to emit this libcall. Do you know which function
> specifically in the .so has a relocation referencing __lshrdi3
> specifically?
It's the right shifts in do_realtime() and do_monotonic().
> Is there a config I can set to reproduce this, in order to help
> test?
I encountered it with a Chrome OS specific configuration, but a
defconfig should do. Note that you probably need a development version
of clang to reproduce this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile | 7 ++++++-
> > lib/lshrdi3.c | 4 +++-
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > index 5bfe2243a08f..7517cd87e10b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += $(call cc-option, -foptimize-sibling-calls)
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += -DBUILD_VDSO
> >
> > ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
> > ifneq ($(RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS),)
> > @@ -153,12 +154,16 @@ endif
> >
> > $(obj)/vdso32.so.dbg: KBUILD_CFLAGS = $(KBUILD_CFLAGS_32)
> >
> > +$(obj)/vdso32/lshrdi3.o: $(srctree)/lib/lshrdi3.c FORCE
> > + $(call if_changed_rule,cc_o_c)
>
> + Masahiro to help look at this part (I don't understand this part
> of kbuild).
I bluntly stole that from arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile , which does
something similar.
>
> > +
> > $(obj)/vdso32.so.dbg: FORCE \
> > $(obj)/vdso32/vdso32.lds \
> > $(obj)/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o \
> > $(obj)/vdso32/note.o \
> > $(obj)/vdso32/system_call.o \
> > - $(obj)/vdso32/sigreturn.o
> > + $(obj)/vdso32/sigreturn.o \
> > + $(obj)/vdso32/lshrdi3.o
> > $(call if_changed,vdso)
> >
> > #
> > diff --git a/lib/lshrdi3.c b/lib/lshrdi3.c
> > index 99cfa5721f2d..8a4fc6bcf3a4 100644
> > --- a/lib/lshrdi3.c
> > +++ b/lib/lshrdi3.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > * to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > */
> >
> > -#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/export.h>
>
> Is this a simple cleanup, or?
The vDSO build is unhappy when modules.h draws in a whole bunch of
other kernel headers and export.h is all that's need. It seemed
reasonable to do the 'cleanup' in this patch since we touch it anyway
to place EXPORT_SYMBOL within an #ifdef.
> > #include <linux/libgcc.h>
> >
> > long long notrace __lshrdi3(long long u, word_type b)
> > @@ -42,4 +42,6 @@ long long notrace __lshrdi3(long long u, word_type b)
> >
> > return w.ll;
> > }
> > +#ifndef BUILD_VDSO
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3);
> > +#endif
>
> Compilers (GCC and Clang) will always assume their runtime has these
> helper functions; whether or not they emit libcalls vs inline routines
> is implementation defined. So I agree with this patch; I just would
> like to help confirm/test it.
Thanks for your help!
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-15 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 19:54 Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-03-15 21:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-03-15 22:29 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-03-15 23:18 ` hpa
2019-03-18 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 17:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-03-18 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 20:44 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-03-18 23:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-20 14:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-20 13:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-20 15:45 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190315222906.GC112750@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=manojgupta@chromium.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=srhines@google.com \
--cc=tcwang@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome